Search for: "USA V. IN"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 11,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2006, 6:00 pm
Some of the most complex and contentious aspects of contemporary antitrust litigation involve threshold determinations about what kind of market participants are entitled to bring antitrust cases. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:05 am
Here's the short summary of the status conference I attended this morning: the case is definitely NOT on the verge of settling. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:23 pm
Nestle USA Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:41 pm
In USA v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:24 pm
Nestle USA Inc. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 7:35 am
Stewart v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 8:46 pm
The case cite is Kona USA, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 6:00 pm
Wade in June, some justices on the Supreme Court have been speaking out about public reaction to the ruling”: John Fritze of USA Today has this report. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:17 pm
Wade”: Bart Jansen of USA Today has this report. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 10:06 am
” John Fritze of USA Today has this report. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 10:44 am
” Maureen Groppe of USA Today has this report. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
In Mies v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 7:56 am
USA v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:12 am
WiLAN USA, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:45 am
The Federal Circuit also agreed with the Board that a likelihood of confusion would result from an applicant’s registration of LEHMAN BROTHERS for alcohol and dining services (Tiger Lily Ventures Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 7:48 am
Furthermore, the appellate court reiterated that financial difficulties and litigation do not excuse nonuse or toll the running of the nonuse period (To-Ricos, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:14 am
That is, it was a derivative, extract, or cannabinoid originating from the cannabis plant and containing “not more than 0.3 percent” delta-9 THC (AK Futures LLC v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 7:24 am
” Although the likelihood of confusion was ordinarily a fact-intensive issue, this was one of the rare instances in which the mark owner’s case was so weak that summary judgment was appropriate, in the Ninth Circuit’s view (Lerner & Rowe PC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:35 am
Further, VICC failed to establish that its two marks had acquired secondary meaning (VI Carnival Committee Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 8:08 am
Brittex, not Dollar, was the first to use that mark in connection with pawn brokerage and pawn shop services, said the court, and the Board provided no support for the notion that a registrant has priority as to a specific service it was second to offer just because it was first to offer a different specific service (Brittex Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
