Search for: "United States v. All Right, Title & Interest"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 2,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:29 pm
Fernandez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The Secretary downplayed the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
OpinionShort Title/District 08a0340p.062008/09/08 Mohnkern v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
The “turnaround notice” gave Lawrence Gordon Productions “the perpetual right . . . to acquire all of the right, title and interest of Fox [Watchmen] pursuant to the terms and conditions herein provided. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:33 pm
blurb:"Now in its third edition, Intellectual Property in Europe covers the entire range of laws and regulations affecting IP in Europe [it would be a lot bigger if it did, since all the national IP laws of 27 Member States also affect IP in Europe], giving you all the information relating to this topic. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
But this case is not about the United States' or Texas' rights to implement criminal laws. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 pm
" (citing United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:51 pm
Section 1498(b) of title 28, United States Code, contains the waiver of immunity for copyright infringement. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
United States, 116 U. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 4:34 am
United States, 61 Fed. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:09 pm
US (1935) 295 U.S. 78, 88: "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:20 pm
The author himself has stated that the point of the story was to showcase how owning a TV set can destroy all interest in literature - so making a movie version seems pretty damn ballsy to say the least. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:18 am
That inconvenience, however, is one of the fundamental protections that separates the United States of America from totalitarian regimes. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:28 pm
As we said in United States v. [read post]
