Search for: "United States v. Cores"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 3,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2009, 12:12 pm
The Munaf decision, Judge Ginsburg wrote, established that courts may not judge a planned transfer of a detainee to another country in the face of “the policy of the United States not to transfer a detainee to a country where he is likely to be tortured. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:06 am
The justices will hear oral argument in Fulton v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
Md. 2023), available at https://www.justice.gov/atr/case/usv-cargill-meat-solutions-corp-et-al. [6] United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 3:43 pm
V. [read post]
9 Jan 2006, 4:42 pm
In 1973, the Supreme Court attempted to define obscenity in Miller v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:28 am
The case was Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court offered in a majority opinion just a few months ago in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:25 pm
The lead case is Maqaleh v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:28 am
” The California Public Employees’ Retirement System—the largest public pension fund in the United States—described proxy access as a “top priority. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:57 am
We now have a name for that group, courtesy of Justice Kagan’s comments in this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:28 am
“Officially, the subjective prong is still viable” in determining if a search was consensual, noted Ric Simmons, but after [the Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 11:29 pm
Indeed, in Trump v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:05 pm
In the 1983 case of INS v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:30 am
Answering all of these "difficult questions at the core of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence" in the negative (and suppressing all seized evidence) in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 7:16 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: District Court W D Washington re-affirms that first sale doctrine can apply to “licensed” software: Vernor v Autodesk (Electronic Frontier Foundation) (Technology & Marketing) (Ars Technica) (Spicy IP) Australian ISP in court for not disconnecting users: AFACT v iiNet (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak)… [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
United States, in which the court will decide next term whether the Fourth Amendment requires that the government obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers, observing that the case calls on the justices to “puzzle over the implications of an 18th-century rule for a distinctly 21st-century reality. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:30 pm
Kwikset Corporation v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
