Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 2441 - 2460
of 61,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Moreover, the contention that the Rockford Eclipse Valve Replacement work was “state-funded and/or state-incentivized” could not establish the source of the funds that paid for the work, i.e. whether it was paid for through public financing, making it “public work” as the statute defines such work. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
The appeal hearing took place before three judges, two of whom worked in the prosecutor’s office at the time of the sinking of the ferry. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:19 am
U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Recent United States Supreme Court decisions, such as Shelley v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Agency's initial decision sustaining an employee's out-of-title work grievance overturned by the Governor's Office Of Employee RelationsMatter of Cushing v Governor's Off. of Empl. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Indeed, in today’s South Dakota v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:55 am
Additional Resources: Jones v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:55 am
Additional Resources: Jones v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 am
Dr Potamianos had been working on digital drives long before his engagement with SEL, starting with his work for the PhD thesis. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:11 pm
One may perhaps take umbrage that it has taken 18 years for this death penalty case to work its way through the Arizona state system and finally get to the Ninth Circuit (after every court below denied relief). [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:18 am
Trooper Richard Woollens, a Maryland State Police officer working approved secondary employment ... [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Key Insight: Recorded phone call between party and copyright agent regarding image timing confidential at prelitigation phase Nature of Case: copyright dispute Electronic Data Involved: phone call recording Keywords: protective order, confidential phone call, work-product Identified State Rule(s): FRBC Rule 4-4.1, 4-1.2 Identified Federal Rule(s): 26(b)(3), 37(a)(5) View Case Opinion [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:34 am
Contracts — Intentional interference with contract — Failure to state a claim Appellant Richard Eichen worked for Jackson and Tull Chartered Engineers, (“J&T”) as a Transportation Management Specialist from August 1, 2012 to May 23, 2014. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 1:18 pm
" Whitman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 1:24 pm
See Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:24 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:36 pm
Unfortunately, a federal judge has dismissed the case, Doc Society v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:18 am
United States v. [read post]
