Search for: "York v York" Results 2441 - 2460 of 52,890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2023, 7:44 am by Scott Bomboy
The appeals court reconsidered Rahimi’s appeal after the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
” by Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) for Yahoo News The post Thursday’s LobbyComply News Roundup appeared first on State and Federal Communications. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:17 am by Eric Goldman
For more on these topics, see my pieces: The Constitutionality of Mandating Editorial Transparency Zauderer and Compelled Editorial Transparency Amicus Brief in NetChoice v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 1:06 am by Nedim Malovic
Therefore, laws vary state by state.The legal differences between the U.S. states became evident in a lawsuit from 2011 between a celebrity photographer and Marilyn Monroe’s estate (Greene Archives v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
An "Administrative action is arbitrary when it is without a sound basis in reason and is taken without regard to the facts," noting C.F. v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 191 AD3d 52 and other decisions cited in the opinion; and 3. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
An "Administrative action is arbitrary when it is without a sound basis in reason and is taken without regard to the facts," noting C.F. v New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene, 191 AD3d 52 and other decisions cited in the opinion; and 3. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:50 am by Peter J. Sluka
A recent decision from the Southern District of New York, Miller v Brightstar Asia, 20-CV-4849 (SDNY Sept 11, 2023) considers a shareholder’s reliance on the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing inherent in the corporation’s shareholders agreement in an attempt to plead what otherwise would be derivative claims as direct ones. [read post]