Search for: "Battle v. State"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 8,255
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2011, 4:05 am
Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 involves the rights of state employees in states that permit state employee unions to charge an agency or service fee to non-union members. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
The first is Weyerhaeuser Company v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 10:01 am
His first principle — "no compelled speech, thought, or belief" — reminds us of the important precedent set by West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:37 pm
” Amestoy was the author of Baker v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 3:43 am
Apparently AutoDesk is not pleased with this state of affairs and has been engaged in a running battle with Mr. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am
” But, he continues, “it was by no means the final legal battle over educational choice in the United States. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
| Mr Justice Carr grants TQ Delta injunction after finding ZyXEL "holding out" in latest SEP battle | AIPPI UK Event Report: AI Generated Innovation | No interim injunction for copyright infringement => not a Happy Camper | DSM Directive Series #1: Do Member States have to transpose the [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
Given the differing traditions from which its judges are drawn, and bearing in mind that the court has not regarded the award of just satisfaction as its principal concern, it is not altogether surprising that it has generally dealt with the subject relatively briefly, and has offered little explanation of its reasons for awarding particular amounts or for declining to make an award”, per Lord Reed, Regina (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] 2 AC 254 [34]. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
State v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 9:22 am
Reeves appealed to the 11th Circuit, which had held in Walker v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:33 am
Harlow v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Here's a roundup of some recent commentary on AT&T v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm
Responding to that statement, Laws LJ made a number of (now well publicised) observations, which, though vigorously stated, are hardly controversial, upholding the need for a principled approach in the application of law. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 3:45 am
In analyzing the plaintiffs’ Article III standing, the court relied on Remijas v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 3:44 pm
" United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:14 pm
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967); Cablevision of Michigan, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Finally, JURIST’s Jaclyn Belczyk covers Thursday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
Judge Koh, who was made globally famous when she presided in the Apple v Samsung dispute, stated that to do so would essentially be going overboard. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
United States in Kermit L. [read post]
