Search for: "CRIM" Results 2461 - 2480 of 4,178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2010, 3:29 am by SHG
  As those of us disinclined to believe that every defendant deserves the death penalty aren't necessarily huge fans of Justice Kagan, any more than we were of Justice Sotomayor, who we learned was an avowed lefty crim-symp only after our hopes of winning in the Second Circuit were crushed under her wise Latina heel, we might be surprised to learn how little we know. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:57 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Varsani, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1938 (05 August 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Dee v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1939 (QB) (28 July 2010) Drake v Starkey [2010] EWHC 2004 (QB) (05 August 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) TR v Asylum and Immigration Tribunal [2010] EWHC 2055 (Admin) (05 August 2010) Jisha v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 2043 (Admin) (05 August 2010) High Court (Commercial Court)… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:28 am by Michael Moffitt
I wonder if anyone can direct me to simulations / roleplays that take place in a criminal law setting. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:29 am by michael
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) CRC Credit Fund Ltd & Ors v GLG Investments Plc (Sub-Fund: European Equity Fund) & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 917 (02 August 2010) TM (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 916 (30 July 2010) Sheffield City Council v Wall (Personal Representatives of) & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 922 (30 July 2010) ZA (Nigeria) & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 926 (30 July 2010)… [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:17 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Ullman, A 10-Year Update of Review and Critique of Empirical Studies of Rape Avoidance, 34 Crim. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 3:54 am by michael
Regina v Chaytor and others; 2010] EWCA Crim 1910; [2010] WLR (D) 218 “Parliamentary privilege or immunity from criminal prosecution did not attach, and never had attached, to ordinary criminal activities by members of Parliament. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:38 am by sally
Regina v B (F); Same v P (A); Same v C (J) [2010] EWCA Crim 1857; [2010] WLR (D) 21 “A judge sitting in the Crown Court had no power to quash an indictment simply because he did not believe that the proceedings were appropriately brought or were not in the public interest when compared with his assessment of the needs of other cases and that had not changed as a result of the introduction of the Criminal Procedure Rules 2010. [read post]