Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 2461 - 2480 of 11,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2020, 6:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bernhardt (Endangered Species Act; National Forest Management Act) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlNew Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:01 pm by Unknown
Bernhardt (Endangered Species Act; National Forest Management Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlNew Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:48 am by Sean Mirski, Shira Anderson
But the Chinese government has protested strongly, and some legislators in Congress have argued that American courts should be open to these kinds of suits. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 7:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
For these reasons, lawsuits challenging use of the FWW method of pay are popular among the plaintiffs’ bar. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:22 am by Richard Hunt
Strojnik has already been declared a vexatious litigant by another Federal Court in California and was disbarred in his home state of Arizona. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The appellate court said, that “just because there are differences between the California Labor Code and the FLSA provisions does not render them dissimilar” and concluded that the district court “rightly” applied the exclusion to preclude coverage for the state law claims. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 7:01 am by Bruce Hoffman, Jacob Ware
The 2019 Poway, California, shooting, that killed one person and wounded three others, coincided with the last day of Passover and the Jewish Sabbath. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 6:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
We set a high bar for cordoning off new types of speech for diminished protection. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 7:36 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Regents of the University of California, Professor Christopher Walker notes a potential implication of the Court's refusal to consider the justifications for the Trump Administration's actions offered in the Nielsen memo. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Brinna Ludwig
In a brief to the Court, California State Attorney General Xavier Becerra argued that the sanctuary law follows constitutional precedent permitting states to prevent their own agencies from carrying out federal policy. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:44 am by Amy Howe
” In the majority’s view, the Trump administration had failed to meet even this relatively low bar. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:26 am by Brianna Bell
The District Court entered an injunction barring the planned expansion. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 4:29 pm by Nassiri Law
A California court made a similar ruling in a previous gender discrimination class action lawsuit against technology company Oracle Corp. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
The Court affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s finding that the lawsuits against Amazon and its customers—Patreon, Vox Media, Dictionary.com, Vice Media, Oath,... [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
The Court affirmed the United States District Court for the Northern District of California’s finding that the lawsuits against Amazon and its customers—Patreon, Vox Media, Dictionary.com, Vice Media, Oath, Inc., Buzzfeed, Popsugar and Ziff Davis—were barred in part by a 1907 Supreme Court ruling, Kessler v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
 If the Referee is a member of the State Bar, the order must include the Referee’s State Bar number. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
 If the Referee is a member of the State Bar, the order must include the Referee’s State Bar number. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
The court's reasoning tracks the reasoning of appellate courts in California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, and Washington, but is much more detailed, and is a welcome addition to that body of precedents. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
Sessions argues that the California Values Act defies a 1996 federal law that bars state and local governments from prohibiting the exchange of "information regarding" an individual's immigration status. [read post]