Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 34,273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2023, 4:25 pm
Such is the teaching of the First District Court of Appeal’s December 28, 2022 published opinion in Charles Jenkins et al v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2022 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York Pistol and Rifle Association, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 11:01 am
Dec. 30, 2022) Plaintiffs sued for breach of express warranty under New York and California law, violation of the New York General Business Law (“GBL”) §§ 349 and 350, and the usual California claims. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 9:50 am
In most states, including California, that could be actionable defamation, but is sometimes subject to so-called "qualified privileges. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:06 am
Last Friday, Bloomberg Law had: California Can Change Name of UC Hastings Law School, For NowA California trial judge tentatively allowed the state to change the name of UC Hastings College of the Law under legislation created in response to founder Serranus C. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 7:08 am
Copyright * Wallster, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:35 am
The case involves a California law prohibiting sale of pork produced from pigs that were not humanely raised. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Raich (where the Court bent the Tenth Amendment to prohibit marijuana cultivation that was legal in California), the similar 2006 decision Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
McDonald v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:37 pm
In the wake of this year’s Supreme Court decision in Dobbs overruling Roe v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
[1] Tom Ginsburg & Mila Versteeg, From Catalonia to California: Secession in Constitutional Law, 70 Ala. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:00 pm
The low point came in Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 9:03 am
That meant that when Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 6:42 am
California: “I read ‘no law . . . abridging’ to mean no law abridging. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm
Trump v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 12:04 pm
California Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 9:00 am
appeared first on California Partition and Eminent Domain Law Blog. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court’s June decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
