Search for: "Child v. Child" Results 2461 - 2480 of 31,278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2013, 4:44 am by Robert A. Epstein
  That brings me to the Appellate Division's recently unpublished (not precedential) decision in Phillips v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:30 am by Guest Blogger
Kenji YoshinoFor the Conference on Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th Anniversaries In my intervention, I plan to unpack the “child-protective” argument relating to same-sex marriage by using the case study of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:12 pm by Liisa Speaker
However, in May 2012, the Court of Appeals reversed that conviction in People v Kloosterman, 296 Mich App 636; 823 NW2d 134 (2012). [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:59 pm
Matter of Ryan v Levine 2011 NY Slip Op 00517 Decided on January 25, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department upheld the Family Court’s upward modification of child support and judgment against father for arrears because father’s significant change in income along with increased costs for necessities like shelter, education, and medicine, represented a substantial change in circumstances warranting [...] [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Matter of Lockitt v Booker 2011 NY Slip Op 00382 Decided on January 18, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Wife petitioned for an upwars modification of child support, husband did not show up to the hearing, and the Family Court entered a default order. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 12:41 pm
Through a long opinion that is not easily summarized, the Ninth Circuit speaks to a range of child porn federal sentencing issues today in in US v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
The former same-sex partner of the mother of a child born through donor insemination may have an obligation to pay child support, according to a September 11 ruling in H.M. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 3:41 am by Stephen Pitel
The Supreme Court of Canada, in Office of the Children’s Lawyer v Balev (available here), has evolved the law in Canada on the meaning of a child’s habitual residence under Article 3 of the Hague Convention. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 3:50 pm
The First Circuit Federal Defender Blog points to a Memo by the Federal Defenders, in which argues that a provision of the Adam Wash Act, which purports to prevent the defense from viewing or analyzing child pr0n is unconstitutional because 1) defendants would not get a chance to meaningfully analyze all evidence; and 2) it eliminates the presumption of innocence, since the court seems to have to take the government's word that the material, is, in fact, child pr0n. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 4:34 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Last week, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave on three cases challenging the constitutionality of the Felony Non-support Act; the statute criminalizing the failure to pay timely child support to the custodial parent.This blog has covered the felony child support issue relative to the People v Likine case from Oakland County Circuit Court. [read post]