Search for: "District of Columbia Government, Appeal of" Results 2461 - 2480 of 3,634
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 3:22 pm by Robert Thornton
In a major victory for advocates of regulatory action to address climate change, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected challenges to the listing of the polar bear as a threatened species. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 3:22 pm by Robert Thornton
In a major victory for advocates of regulatory action to address climate change, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected challenges to the listing of the polar bear as a threatened species. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
§ 51.016 (West Supp. 2011) ("In a matter subject to the [FAA], a person may take an appeal . . . to the court of appeals from the judgment or interlocutory order of a district court, county court at law, or county court under the same circumstances that an appeal from a federal district court's order or decision would be permitted by 9 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:37 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
§ 51.016 (West Supp. 2011) ("In a matter subject to the [FAA], a person may take an appeal . . . to the court of appeals from the judgment or interlocutory order of a district court, county court at law, or county court under the same circumstances that an appeal from a federal district court's order or decision would be permitted by 9 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 11:21 am by Cathy
The rulings of the examiners and even the Commissioner of Patents himself are subject to review of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:31 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has affirmed the status quo of marijuana being not only illegal, but a highly dangerous and addictive drug with no accepted medicinal uses or benefits. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:16 am by James J. La Rocca
In a groundbreaking opinion, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals has ruled that three appointments of officers to the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board” or the “NLRB”) by President Barrack Obama were unconstitutional because they lacked the “Advice and Consent” of the Senate and were not authorized by the Constitution’s so-called Recess Appointments Clause. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:52 am by Michael Steven Green
My penultimate Erie question is about the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:26 pm by Wells Bennett
 Because they violate the law of war, these seven offenses may be tried by military commission, a conclusion that is reinforced by the analysis of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in its decision last October in the Hamdan II case. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:45 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 2007). . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by Senator Datuk S. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 6:46 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
In this case, the matter would be appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; the DC Circuit is notorious for settling questions on matters involving government agencies. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, is significant because: (1) it involves a dispute over some fundamental but complex First Amendment doctrinal principles; (2) it conflicts with a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and (3) (for reasons 1 and 2), it may very well end up in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:56 am by Wells Bennett
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit noted: The determination of when hostilities have ceased is a political decision, and we defer to the Executive’s opinion on the matter, at least in the absence of an authoritative congressional declaration purporting to terminate the war. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia last week heard arguments from a conservative watchdog group seeking to overturn a federal judge's refusal to order the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
Solicitor General, representing the federal government as an amicus. [read post]
5 Jan 2013, 4:20 pm by Howard Friedman
This Court joins other district courts and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in taking these representations to be a binding commitment. [read post]