Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2010, 7:46 pm
s proposed section 11300 addition does not trump the medical marijuana laws because while 11300 basically says “regardless of what any other law says, these things are legal,” it does not say, “only these things are legal. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
Significantly, the Appeals Chamber confirmed that Article 27(2) of the Rome Statute reflects customary international law (para. 103). [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:00 pm
What Does "Isolation" Really Mean? [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:49 am
El Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea, en su sentencia C-103/18, Sánchez Ruiz y C-429/18 Fernández Álvarez y otras/ Comunidad de Madrid (Servicio madrileño de Salud) de 19 de marzo de 2020, ha declarado que no es misión del Tribunal europeo reprimir los abusos de la contratación temporal o interinaje abusivo, sino que incumbe a los órganos jurisdiccionales nacionales – dentro de la amplia gama de posibilidades-… [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
“reverse CEQA”), CEQA does require an analysis when a project exacerbates an environmental impact, e.g., wildfire risk; Add energy as an impact category for MNDs (and not just EIRs) with new questions requiring analysis of a project’s energy consumption and compliance with state or local energy laws; Clarifies that both state and federal wetland impacts must be evaluated; Clarifies that public, not private, view impacts are relevant to a CEQA analysis; and Moves… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
James G. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
The following documents, submitted before the opposition division, are relevant for the present decision:D4 WO 03/015519 A1D8 WO 2005/048711 A1D8P1 DE 103 53 278.1(first priority application of D8)D8P2 DE 10 2004 006 075.4(second priority application of D8)D9 Experimental report - field trials (18 pages,filed with the notice of opposition)D10 Experimental report (2 pages, filed with thenotice of opposition)D21 Additional Test Data (6 pages, filed by thepatent proprietor (respondent) with… [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
” Although the statute does not use the word “lesser,” state courts have used the phrase “lesser included” to describe the offenses falling within its scope. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
Even the fight against terrorism “cannot in itself justify that national legislation providing for the general and indiscriminate retention of all traffic and location data should be considered necessary” [para 103]. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:47 am
” A review of the record does not bear this out. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:21 pm
Compared to the LRA, the AEPA does not provide for strikes or lockouts. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 7:48 am
The public health literature, however, does not support this approach, as electronic cigarettes are categorically less risky than traditional cigarettes. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
” Id. at 103. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
REV. 103 (2018). 6. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:47 pm
It does exclude the fine arts. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 10:22 am
Code § 103]. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Even where a problem is understood to be a legal problem, a substantial proportion of the public does not seek legal assistance. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
Although the claim does not now define an upper limit for the cooling rate, it might be argued that an appropriate value in practice would be readily apparent to the skilled person. [10] The OD was also of the view that there was no support for the amendment of the claim to include the feature of “maintaining the austenite grain dimensions larger than 150 µm” in the hot deforming step. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 5:46 pm
“There shall be no trial by jury” 50 ILCS 5/103 Judges may be more sophisticated but judges also appreciate the clarity a demonstrative exhibit can provide. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:03 am
The Gap in 102 for Self-Harming Prior Art: Everyone knows that you cannot obtain a patent that merely claims an obvious variant of the prior art. 35 U.S.C. 103. [read post]
