Search for: "Doe Corporation"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 51,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
For a “corporate person,” does the answer depend on where the corporation is headquartered? [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 9:17 am
They should not be able to hide in corporate form, and the treaty does not provide protection for corporations from prosecution. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
Such an employee resembles an independent contractor who can shift from firm to firm at low cost to either employee or employer.[4] Because the relationship between such employees and the corporation does not create appropriable quasi-rents, opportunism by the board is not a concern. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:08 pm
Conclusion Mr Vassall-Adams does of course have a point in the paragraph I quote earlier in this article about powerful companies. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:21 am
And it does seem like they have a point in applying the term here. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:10 pm
It now gets the majority of its budget from big corporations such as Pfizer, Bank of America, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kaiser Permanente, Wyeth-Ayerst, and Verizon.Number 15It used to be when a corporation committed a crime, they pled guilty to a crime.So, for example, so many large corporations were pleading guilty to crimes in the 1990s, that in 2000, we put out a report titled The Top 100 Corporate Criminals of the 1990s. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 3:41 pm
It now gets the majority of its budget from big corporations such as Pfizer, Bank of America, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Kaiser Permanente, Wyeth-Ayerst, and Verizon.Number 15It used to be when a corporation committed a crime, they pled guilty to a crime.So, for example, so many large corporations were pleading guilty to crimes in the 1990s, that in 2000, we put out a report titled The Top 100 Corporate Criminals of the 1990s. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 7:00 pm
The current financial turmoil demonstrates that the approach does not work in the best intersts of shareholders. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
That courts outside of Delaware will get corporate governance wrong, just like Congress does: The law relating to risk is still evolving, and the prevalent media/political condemnation of "excessive risk" may drive some bad results in litigation, just as it apparently has driven Congress to assume (erroneously in my view) that pervasive corporate governance failures caused the 2008–2009 financial meltdown. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:08 pm
It does not allow companies to regulate themselves.Second, the political debate sometimes seems to revolve around the flawed notion that there is a choice between two systems: formal regulation or comply-or-explain. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 3:55 pm
Does information presented need to be in a “printer-friendly” format? [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 11:17 am
Steginsky did reject the notion that federal law imposes a general affirmative duty on corporate insiders to disclose material nonpublic information. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:10 pm
Just as US law recognizes juridical persons as "persons" for certain purposes, so does international law. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 6:56 am
For example, the client may be a corporation; in some circumstances (arguably, the ones that matter most), it may not be clear what natural persons are authorized to make decisions for the corporation. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:03 am
, cogently argues on its issue page: Copyright reform can ensure the law does not discriminate against new industries in favor of legacy industries . . . [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
"Thus," the court continues, a nonjudicial dissolution pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1001 does not require a court's permission, the Supreme Court correctly determined that dissolution pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1001 does not require court action and, therefore, there was no need to address the impact, if any, of the resolution dated February 16, 2010. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:36 am
On March 22, 2013, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (collectively, the “bank regulators”) released their final guidance on leveraged lending activities. [1] The final guidance does not deviate significantly from the proposed guidance released last year on March 26, 2012, but does attempt to provide clarity in response to the many… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Merely removing the 'or' from the pleading does not remedy the defect. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:49 pm
App. 2008), the Georgia Supreme Court stated that an officer's personal liability for corporate debts due to a piercing of the corporate veil rests on the notion that a corporate officer, or owner, who has abused the corporate form by commingling personal and corporate assets, should be held liable for corporate debts and liabilities. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:21 pm
The court determined that a corporate complaint signed by a non-lawyer does not necessarily constitute a nullity. [read post]
