Search for: "Does, 1-25" Results 2461 - 2480 of 18,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 1:45 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Shortly after T 1402/13, R.51(2) was amended (per 1/1/2017) for clarification by addition of a last sentence "The legal consequence laid down in Article 86, paragraph 1, shall ensue upon expiry of the six-month period. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 8:17 am by Holman
Cir. 2014), the Federal Circuit held claims invalid for indefiniteness because the specification failed to adequately define the claim limitation “unobtrusive manner that does not distract a user. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:42 pm by Anthony Zaller
The California Attorney General enforcement of the CCPA does not start until July 1, 2020. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:41 am by DMLP Staff
Stat. 105/103.05(a)(26), but does not have a special corporate form for a non-profit cooperative. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:09 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson and Carla N. Hutton
A reportable chemical substance does not include a chemical substance that is manufactured or processed in a form where less than 1% of any particles, including aggregates, and agglomerates, measured by weight are in the size range of 1-100 nanometers. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:25 am by JP Sarmiento
On June 25, 2014, our office was notified by the USCIS that our client’s F-1 reinstatement was granted. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 6:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Yet this case does not have any such publicly available order explaining the compelling basis for the sealing. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
Later executed affidavits were admissible evidence under Article 117(1) EPC. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:01 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auditors also found situations where DOE provided services without the required parental consent. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:18 am
In a nutshell, the GC found that:The trade mark at issue would not be a pattern mark, but an ordinary figurative mark; The forms of use, eg colour scheme, of said trade mark should not to be taken into account; and adidas failed to prove acquired distinctiveness throughout the EU.Let's see more in detail how the court reasoned.BackgroundIn 2014. adidas obtained an EUTM for the sign represented above, described as consisting of "three parallel equidistant stripes of identical… [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:01 am by Public Employment Law Press
Auditors also found situations where DOE provided services without the required parental consent. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am by Jessica Kroeze
This does not exclude the skilled person starting their considerations from any piece of prior art they might be aware of. [read post]
2 May 2016, 5:00 am by Kollias & Giese, P.C.
  For example, if a parent lives in Antioch, Illinois and desires to move into Wisconsin, as long as he or she relocates across the border but stays within 25 miles of the Antioch residence, he or she does not need to ask permission from the non-residential parent or the court. [read post]