Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 12,791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2021, 2:06 am
Additionally, authorization of the inclusion of protected works in a communication to the public does not exhaust the right to authorize or prohibit other communications to the public of such works. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:50 am
Oral proceedings took place before the Technical Board of Appeal (the “TBA”) in November 2013 and the written decision was issued on 29 January 2014. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 6:10 am
The Office does not require commercial success, which would have the effect of limiting the number of valid demonstrations; minimal use could be sufficient. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:18 am
Nor does every defendant and every case justify the kind of research we do. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:36 pm
Effective immediately, I hereby supersede and rescind the June 1 memorandum. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
(3) Does section 17200 et seq. apply to overtime work performed outside of California for a California-based employer by out-of-state plaintiffs in the circumstances of this case if the employer failed to comply with the overtime provisions of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:31 pm
(1) Ryan Doerfler, High Stakes Interpretation, 116 Mich. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 1:54 pm
As its title indicates, the notice is just that, it does not spell out the specifics. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Nor does the PTO inquire into whether the famous person also sells the goods or services in question, as it does with private individuals under Section 1052(c). [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:30 am
The petitions of the week are: Doe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:39 am
ComplexDiscovery anonymizes responses to this survey and does not share any individual or organizational contact data, demographics or answers. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 6:11 am
Sec. 1.72(p)-1). [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm
The referring court has accordingly stayed the proceedings and referred the following questions to the Court for a preliminary ruling: (1) Does the concept of ‘fair compensation’ in Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29 entail harmonisation, irrespective of the Member States’ right to choose the system of collection which they deem appropriate for the purposes of giving effect to the right to fair compensation of intellectual… [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Second, it has a flat 20 percent tax on individual income that does not apply to personal dividend income. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
But apparently this decision has come as a surprise in some quarters.The s.215(1) argument remains to be heard. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
But apparently this decision has come as a surprise in some quarters.The s.215(1) argument remains to be heard. [read post]
8 May 2017, 7:55 am
” 29 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
See Doe v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Additionally, the contract does not violate the Statute of Frauds because the writing does not state a specific date of performance (i.e. closing date) or because of the failure to designate the nature of the interest being conveyed.Analysis of Mezher v. [read post]
