Search for: "Does 1-37"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 5,286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2014, 11:24 am
Rules 16, 26, 34, 37, and 45 have been amended by the SJC and have been implemented in every Department of the Trial Court since January 1, 2014. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
(D057446; 201 Cal.App.4th 1134; San Diego County Superior Court; GIC855643, GIC855701, 37-200700083692-CU-WM-CTL, 37-2007-00083773-CU-MC-CTL, 37-2007-00083768-CU-TT-CTL.) [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 11:31 am
Balkin, What the Bush Veto Means (July 19, 2006)37. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:17 pm
— 31 (1)? [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
This also means that it does not define a multiplicity of varieties which necessarily consists of s [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am
Babos, 2014 SCC 16, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 309, at para. 41. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
” Residents of a Contracting Party are clearly within the “jurisdiction” of that Contracting Party for purposes of Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:59 am
Those Four Pillars appear at first blush to deal strictly with the allocation of U.S. hard power: (1) Self-protection (NSS, pp. 7-14); (2) Trade and prosperity (pp. 17-23); (3) Peace through strength (pp. 25-35); (4) Advancing American influence (pp. 37-42). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
[1] See Ritchie v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
A breach of s. 530(3) is an error of law warranting appellate intervention under s. 686(1)(a). [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:31 am
Though the HMID is often viewed as a policy that increases the incidence of homeownership, research suggests the HMID does not accomplish this goal. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:15 pm
” The complaint (lawsuit) which Jane Doe’s lawyer filed further alleges additional details, which include: The incident occurred on “December 1, 2018;” This was the “first cruise” of Jane Doe, a resident of the State of Washington; “On the last night of the subject cruise, Jane Doe went up a stairwell. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:39 am
Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions (recast) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee [1], Acting in… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:39 am
Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions (recast) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee [1], Acting in… [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
But this alternative does not so much displace as extend conventional constitutional theory as a set of static premises that structure the organization of legitimate governance units. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
But this alternative does not so much displace as extend conventional constitutional theory as a set of static premises that structure the organization of legitimate governance units. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
The existing Indian family exception is a judicially created doctrine holding that the ICWA does not apply to those Indian children who have never been a member of an Indian home or culture and probably never would be.[14] Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians[15], many states adopted the existing Indian family exception. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 6:32 am
Under N.J.S.A. 37:2-38, such a litigant had to prove by clear and convincing evidence that: a. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 8:00 am
Does she appear honest? [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 5:28 pm
If men and women are distributed across occupations in exactly the same way, the index is 0; if there is complete separation, the index is 1. [read post]
