Search for: "English v. English" Results 2461 - 2480 of 11,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by INFORRM
Firstly, Ryan Giggs – in the scheme of internet publication – was only an English Premiership footballer. [read post]
 Second, you need to consider whether to register your mark in just English, just Chinese, or both. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:20 am by Marta Requejo
” Related posts:Forum non conveniens, anti-suit injunctions, and concurrent US and Australian copyright proceedings In TS Production LLC v Drew Pictures Pty Ltd [2008]... [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
On that hypothesis, it would have been difficult to defend the guidance given by the Court of Appeal in Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc [2008] Bus LR 888 to the effect that the English court should normally refuse a stay of its own proceedings if it would be likely to resolve the question of validity significantly earlier. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
"The French decision can be found here.The English translation of the decision can be found here. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Zheng v Your New Car Calgary Inc, 2015 ABQB 121 [17] The Plaintiff refers to Bhasin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
 Because the English Court had jurisdiction over the defendant it has no power to stay proceedings on the grounds of forum non conveniens (see Owusu v Jackson [2005] 1 QB 801, ECJ). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am by Rosalind English
This is a shortened version of an article published by Rosalind English in the Journal of Environmental Law and Management November 2011: Cooperation and Public Goods: an evolutionary perspective on environmental law  23 ELM 278-283  In my 2011 post Why be nice? [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:34 am by JanNovak
Patrick Charles, a Cleveland-Marshall alumnus, published his article “Arms for Their Defence: An Historical, Legal, and Textual Analysis of the English Right to Have Arms and Whether the Second Amendment Should Be Incorporated in McDonald v. [read post]