Search for: "Fee v. Fee" Results 2461 - 2480 of 31,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2007, 8:08 am
Supreme Court in Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:39 am by Paul Caron
Following up on this morning's post, IRS Seeks to Treat Nursing Home Entrance Fees as Taxable Pre-Paid Rent, Not Tax-Free Interest-Free Loans: the Tax Court case is CC-Development Group, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:04 am
Le v Le 2011 NY Slip Op 01806 Decided on March 8, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department affirmed the supreme court’s award to wife of counsel fees incurred in enforcing the judgment of divorce because husband unjustifiably refused to release money held in escrow after the sale of the house pursuant to the judgment. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:59 pm by Soha and Lang
Co., 2012 WL 402050, the Washington Supreme Court addressed the pro rata fee sharing rule announced in Mahler v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:40 pm by Simon Gibbs
  The Law Society is to make written submissions in a forthcoming VAT tribunal case on this issue in Barratt Goff & Tomlinson (BGT) v The Commissioners for HMRC. [read post]
21 May 2015, 6:54 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
(This is distinct from civil rights cases, where the plaintiff's lawyer recovers fees as a matter of course if plaintiff wins the case).The case is Padula v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:37 am by Ted Frank
Courts award fees based on the following factors: (i) the amount of time and effort applied to the case by counsel for the plaintiffs; (ii) the relative complexities of the litigation; (iii) the standing and ability of petitioning counsel; (iv) the contingent nature of the litigation; (v) the stage at which the litigation ended; (vi) whether the plaintiff can rightly receive all the credit for the benefit conferred or only a portion thereof; and (vii) the size of the benefit… [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 1:41 pm by Holly Brezee
Georgia law upholds the Declaration of a homeowners association as a binding contract that cannot be altered by a trial court award unless prohibited by a statute according to the precedent set in Summit at Scarborough Homeowners Association v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 11:11 am by Patricia Salkin
  Discovery Builders, Inc. v City of Oakland, 2023 WL 4115074 (CA App. 6/22/2023). [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:33 pm by Patricia Salkin
Dabbs v Anne Arundel County, MD, 2017 WL 1180542 (MD 3/30/2017)Filed under: Impact Fees, Uncategorized [read post]