Search for: "Glass v. Glass"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 2,791
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:43 pm
It's unconstitutional to execute people with mental retardation, the Court said in Atkins v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Rasberry v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:10 pm
The Federal Court recently issued its judgment in NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:00 pm
In American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
Todd Dickinson’s comments at Bio Conference (IAM) The Charles Rivers Ventures connection – CRV stakes in RPX Corp, Thinkfire and Intellectual Ventures (IAM) Obama Administration tackling patent backlog (IP Watchdog) Patent examiners told to issue patents (IP Watchdog) More funding needed for patent granting authority (IP Watchdog) Short note on patentability of product-by-process claims – Newman J’s opinion in 1985 case In re Thorpe: Abbott v Sandoz… [read post]
22 May 2009, 1:43 pm
A rock shatters the rear window and two rocks enter the car, and some glass shards end up in Baby's hair.Mike's clearly guilty of domestic battery and vandalism. [read post]
21 May 2009, 9:44 pm
Unlike Matthew Chapman's 40 Days and 40 Nights (reviewed here on April 30, 2009), Edward Humes' 2007 book, Monkey Girl would resemble a mural depicting the sprawling case, Kitzmiller v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:11 am
, got pissed off, and ended up throwing a glass flowerpot near the receptionist. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:02 pm
That Holmes chestnut from Schenck v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 2:37 pm
The Amendment further overturns two United States Supreme Court decisions: Sutton v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:59 am
The technology was, in this context, not unconvincingly analogized by the Court to a searchlight, a marine glass, or a field glass (id. at 283, citing United States v Lee, 274 US 559, 563 [1927]). [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:49 pm
Ritchie v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 2:39 pm
On May 7, 2009, the New Jersey Supreme Court held in Bauer v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 1:02 pm
Second, we must ask whether each argument justifies its conclusion, or whether there is reason to see the argument as a rationalization of some deeper sort of anxiety or aversion ("animus", to use the language of Romer v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:04 pm
" In Gallo v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 6:43 am
PROPERTY- EARTH MOVEMENT EXCLUSION - SETTLING OR CRACKING EXCLUSIONPioneer Tower Owners Assn. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 7:06 am
"Hope Does Not Need Rose-tinted Glasses | By Steven FerryHospitality Net - USA"We all agree that if guests are criminal towards us directly, we have every ... [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:17 pm
Ritchie v. [read post]
