Search for: "HALL v. HALL" Results 2461 - 2480 of 5,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Nicola Waghorn, Olswang LLP
Law It was held at both first instance and the Court of Appeal that the correct test for vicarious liability is a two-stage test following the case of Lister v Hesley Hall Limited [2002] 1 AC 215. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 1:36 pm by Holland & Hart
But earlier this month, the Supreme Court denied a petition to hear the case of Hall v DirecTV which would have allowed the Court to weigh in on the joint-employer issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 1:36 pm by Holland & Hart
But earlier this month, the Supreme Court denied a petition to hear the case of Hall v DirecTV which would have allowed the Court to weigh in on the joint-employer issue. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference, she sufficiently alleged the existence of an attorney-client relationship (see Hall v Hobbick, 192 AD3d 776; see also Tropp v Lumer, 23 AD3d at 551). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:00 am by Lyle Denniston
Icon Health & Fitness — right of company accused of patent infringement to recover attorney’s fees if it defeats the claim Monday, March 3: 12-10882 — Hall v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
Significantly, Linden J refers to R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL15 and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 as the two leading Article 9 cases in this jurisdiction. [read post]