Search for: "Harris v. Day"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 2,699
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Harris v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 8:33 pm
This is a very sad day indeed. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
Wrote Justice Harry A. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
As Harry Potter author J.K. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:58 pm
Reasons for judgment were released yesterday (Fortin v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:11 pm
See, e.g., Campbell v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
So, the announcement has been made, and the press releases -- pro and con -- that have been sitting ready for days and weeks now are shooting their way back and forth like a screen-capture from Joshua in Wargames. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:45 am
Harris testified that to this day she's not sure whether her vote registered 0 times, or 1, or 2, or 3, or 4. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:01 am
The court distinguished Ballew v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:25 am
One of your co-hosts - Bexis (Herrmann couldn't make it) - leads off a day-long Harris-Martin conference on "Preemption in a Post-Levine World" at the Rittenhouse Hotel in Philadelphia on June 3, 2009. [read post]
16 May 2009, 12:42 pm
Such qualification should include at least a 10 day delayed application period and an explicit statement that makes the arbitration provisions applicable only to disputes arising after reasonable notice to counter any arguments that the contracts are illusory.The cases are Harris v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:22 am
Parkin v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:58 am
(A Global Day of Action in support of Davis has been organized by Amnesty International USA for May 19th. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
" (Waller v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 5:01 am
As in Smith v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 4:57 pm
By statute, attorney Harris had 60 days thereafter to make the reimbursement to Medicare. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:29 am
Department of Correction v. the N.C. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:07 pm
Since section 112 only addresses the termination of service contracts, this amendment really isn't absolutely necessary, and this is especially so in light of Justice Paul Perel's decision in the case of PSCC No. 668 v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 3:19 am
I'm turning it into a road trip with a couple of buddies and topping the all-day CLE off with a 7:05 p.m. [read post]
5 May 2009, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
