Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2017, 2:22 am
The Court held that the Secretary of State’s decision to refuse the illegal applicants leave to remain, despite their having British partners, was lawful. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
United States, which held that a statute prohibiting interstate travel with the intent to "facilitate" certain kinds of illegal activities could not be used to prosecute a patron of a gambling establishment. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:28 pm
These were the issues on review as stated in the cert. petition: (1) Whether the Fifth Circuit correctly held, in direct conflict with the Second Circuit and district courts in seven other circuits and in conflict with the principles of Basic v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
The ECtHR held that Article 8 did not impose a general obligation on the state to respect the choice by married couples of their matrimonial home. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am
The ECtHR held that Article 8 did not impose a general obligation on the state to respect the choice by married couples of their matrimonial home. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:00 pm
Chang v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 8:35 am
In the matter of Crystal Mandall v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
In Brinkley v Monterey Financial Services Inc., the Ninth Circuit vacated the district court’s remand order, and held that a plaintiff cannot remand an otherwise valid CAFA case to state court when only a portion of the class meets the two-thirds citizenship requirement. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 4:10 am
In the case, Washington state's Supreme Court held that, as applied, the religious and non-profit exemption to the state's anti-discrimination law may be unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, and Davis v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
Uber Technologies Inc. , the California Supreme Court held that it is not bound by the US Supreme Court’s interpretation of state law in Viking River Cruises v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
Bostock v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:40 am
Justice Kagan cited Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of the United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:55 am
United States v. [read post]
