Search for: "High v State" Results 2461 - 2480 of 35,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 6:52 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaBy a 4-2 margin, the Colorado Supreme Court this week held in Denver Post Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Faustman repeatedly reminded the Court that any contrary finding would be quickly disposed of by the High Court. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:44 pm
BCCI also states that WSGML never had media rights to sub- license the same in favour of MSM. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Reuters, Andrew Chung talks to one of the plaintiffs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents Key Findings State Individual Income Tax Structures Map: How High are Individual Income Tax Rates in Your State? [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 12:30 am by Mark Summerfield
Last week I predicted that the High Court would affirm the finding of five judges of the Federal Court of Australia that AstraZenenca’s patents covering low-dosage forms of the cholesterol-lowering drug marketed as CRESTOR (having the active ingredient rosuvastatin) are invalid on grounds of obviousness.In the much-anticipated decision in AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd (et al) [2015] HCA 30, five judges of the High Court, in four distinct concurring opinions, have… [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:37 am
Fittante commented that he is seeing more high stakes litigation. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:01 am by Terry Lenamon
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 4:34 pm
New Mexico is one of only a handful of states that allow complete recovery for all of the costs of raising a child in a wrongful conception case, and the high court found that there should be a high bar to this recovery. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm by lawmrh
United States (11-182) — the Court instead unanimously vacated and remanded 8-0, FCC v. [read post]
California is also the only state that never accepted federal funding under the Title V abstinence-only-until-marriage program. [read post]