Search for: "Ilya Somin"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 2,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2009, 5:35 am
” Ilya Somin continues the debate at Volokh Conspiracy on the constitutionality of Obama’s health care plan. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:35 pm
"On balance, I think getting rid of Chevron will be a modest net plus for immigration liberalization," says Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University and a contributor to The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
7 May 2010, 7:02 am
Ilya Somin, at the Volokh Conspiracy, discusses City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874, Veterans of Foreign Wars v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
Silverglate, Ilya Somin, Walter Olson, Larry E. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:43 am
” At the Volokh Conspiracy, Randy Barnett and Ilya Somin (here and here) both respond to Rosen’s response. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:14 pm
UPDATE: Ilya Somin weighs in over at VC. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
Commentary comes from Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View; Mark Tushnet of Balkinization; Will Baude at the Volokh Conspiracy; Eric Posner at Slate; Daniel Fisher of Forbes; Terry Eastland at the Weekly Standard; Leland Beck for the Federal Regulations Advisor; Douglas Topolski for the Ogletree Deakins blog; David French for the National Review; Ilya Somin at the Volokh Conspiracy; Jeff Shesol of the New Yorker; Peter Shane at RegBlog; Patrick Caldwell at Mother Jones; Allison Bernstein… [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 11:39 am
Along these lines, Ilya Somin argues that the Court should set aside some potential worries about limiting principles, because the slope is far more slippery on the other side. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 3:04 am
Joining in, Ilya Somin offers; Co-blogger Orin Kerr quotes Herbert Hoover’s statement that you don’t have to be a lawyer to understand the Constitution. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
Ilya Somin at The Volokh Conspiracy offers a lengthy commentary on the case. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 3:07 am
"And so, Judge Thomas once again walks down the road of blaming racisim for the sexual harrassment investigation.And I am wondering who will call him on it.See also:The Smear This Time (Anita Hill, New York Times Op-ed)The Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill Controversy and Irrational Hatred of Ideological Adversaries (Ilya Somin @ Volokh)The Left's Strategic Mistake (?) [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 7:41 am
" In his post on the Volokh Conspiracy, Ilya Somin discusses the possible reasons why the Solicitor General, in her petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 5:53 pm
The Volokh Conspiracy by Ilya Somin: New York's Highest Court to Hear Important Eminent Domain Case Law of the Land by Patty Salkin: Atlantic Yards Eminent Domain Case Heads to NY High Court Tomorrow. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:04 am
Ilya Somin argues this point regarding the Prop 8 case. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
In a post entitled “Golden Retriever Takes Stand in New York Criminal Trial,” Ilya Somin of The Volokh Conspiracy recounts how, well, a dog recently “testified” in court in New York. [read post]
30 May 2011, 7:54 am
But it's especially notable (and heartening) that such sentiments now extend beyond budgeting to Fourth Amendment questions.RELATED (5/31): From Ilya Somin at The Volokh Conspiracy, "The Tea Party Movement and Popular Constitutionalism. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:16 am
Randy Barnett and Ilya Somin have articulated this position particularly well. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 4:08 am
” At Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, Ilya Somin writes that although “[p]redicting the justices’ votes based on oral argument is far from an exact science,” “property rights advocates have grounds for cautious optimism. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:19 pm
And Ilya Somin cites further elements forming a pattern: Trump has expressed his wish to “have the FCC take some of his critics off the airwaves” and his regret that protesters at his events could not be dealt with in such a way that they “have to be carried out on a stretcher. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 6:47 am
At the same blog, Ilya Somin argues that the trend Liptak portrays as worrying is actually the positive result of increasing "ideological and jurisprudential diversity" among the justices. [read post]
