Search for: "In Re Adoption of Rule"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 13,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 8:25 am
Treasury is likely to lose revenue whether it adopts Pillar Two or not (if all other countries adopt the rules). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 5:22 am
The adopted rule adds language to address life settlements, clarifies filing requirements, and requires additional disclosures, contract provisions, and reporting requirements. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 7:47 am
That’s why we’re suing to find out what the NSA is hiding. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:26 am
New Articles: Rachel Arnow-Richman, Just Notice: Re-Reforming Employment at Will, 58 UCLA L. [read post]
24 May 2023, 7:55 am
Putting aside Kavanaugh’s statement, the normal rule is that when part of the majority adopts one rule, and the other part adopts a narrower version, the narrower version becomes the precedent. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 4:57 am
(TTABlogged here).In re IP Carrier Consulting Group, 84 USPQ2d 1028 (TTAB 2007) [precedential]. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 2:36 pm
At the same time, individual countries have been adopting digital services taxes that tax the revenues (rather than profits) of certain large, digital companies. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:50 am
Baron (In re Ondova Ltd. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
" That directive leaves SCOTUS free to choose a different rule from the one applied by state courts, but as Justice Sotomayor highlighted in her questioning, there should be at least a presumption in favor of adopting the approach of most states. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
The Court of Appeal ruled that “it is unnecessary for us to take a position on this split of authority because it would not alter the outcome of this appeal. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
The court explains (bolding added): social-media platforms aren’t ‘dumb pipes’: They’re not just servers and hard drives storing information or hosting blogs that anyone can access, and they’re not internet service providers reflexively transmitting data from point A to point B. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 9:08 am
This is basically re-adopting Germany’s current employee data privacy laws. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
The court observed that this view was adopted by the Ninth Circuit in In re HP Inkjet Printer Litig., 716 F.3d 1173 (9th Cir. 2013). [read post]
1 May 2008, 3:58 pm
We’ll see if the Second Circuit ultimately follows suit (I believe the Texas case isn’t binding on the SDNY one, but under a res judicata theory, it’s likely the Second Circuit would recognize the SDTX’s decision and rule in favor of Apache). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
This doctrine was first recognized in a 1995 Wisconsin case, In re Custody of H.S.H. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:15 pm
You’re in distinguished company. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 6:16 am
(Of course, there would also be additional state costs for grant distribution, oversight, rule enforcement, etc..)But I do think that, just as Sen. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:53 am
Third, the Court ruled that the learned intermediary doctrine was not in any way outdated. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:23 am
Although it is certain that re-identification is possible, whether participants will be re-identified is a matter of probability. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:33 am
Under a consent agreement (i.e., settlement), Bauer has also agreed to remove or modify the challenged claims and adopt an enhanced corporate compliance program. [read post]
