Search for: "In Re Steven" Results 2461 - 2480 of 6,044
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2023, 6:24 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
Since Steven’s income is more than the first tax bracket, that portion is subject to tax at 15%. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:34 pm
Editorial, Stevens Offers Stark Example, Wisconsin State Journal May 25, 2010. 3. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 10:53 am by Carissa Hessick
  If I am correct about this argument by analogy to Stevens, then perhaps the federal statute defining child pornography as including images of any person under the age of 18 needs to be re-thought, since the most U.S. states set their age of consent at 16 or 17. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:58 am by Stefanie Levine
  To define business methods, depends on who you’re asking. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 10:25 am
  One of those Justices, John Paul Stevens, remarked at one point: “We have never confronted a case as extreme as this before. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:10 am
  After all, Justice Stevens did not go any length at all to note or highlight that these words signaled a new test. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:59 pm
Alito, Jr., stepped in to say that he did not understand “what you’re saying about citizenship. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:30 am by Lisa McElroy
Comstock, a case involving adult sex offenders that was argued by Elena Kagan, now the nominee to replace Justice Stevens? [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 1:37 am by Kalvis Golde
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Re previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:52 pm by Dan Farber
Trawling for meaning: a new standard for “best scientific information available” in the Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Conservation Act. 60 Cath. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
In re Chippendales USA, Inc., Serial No. 78666598 (March 25, 2009) [precedential].Observing that application of the packaging/product design dichotomy [the former may be inherently distinctive, the latter cannot be] is not feasible when considering a service mark, the Board stated that it "must simply assess whether it is reasonable to assume that the consumer is predisposed to view the trade dress as a source indicator. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:21 am by Steve McConnell
But the main ruling on preemption makes us gag.The plaintiff was a Texas resident who alleged that she developed Stevens-Johnson Syndrome from Lamisil. [read post]