Search for: "In re Means"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 89,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2017, 4:07 am
We’re going to miss them when they’re gone, but by then, it’s too late. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 10:34 am
*not necessarily actual latin….** **not necessarily their actual meanings… [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:32 pm
In his words: “Removing the death penalty does not mean removing punishment. [read post]
25 May 2014, 1:24 pm
Change is inevitable and constant, but that doesn’t mean we’re good at accepting it. [read post]
25 May 2014, 1:24 pm
Change is inevitable and constant, but that doesn’t mean we’re good at accepting it. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
Included on that small and exclusive list should be a case I had to re-read recently to prepare myself to take on juvenile cases: In Re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
With Algeria tying England just now, that means all we need to do to advance to the second round is do what England by rights should have just done -- beat Algeria. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:55 am
Pull Over If You’re Tired Officials with the CHP are reminding motorists to pull over to rest areas if they’re feeling tired or fatigued behind the wheel. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:49 am
This means if you’re in D.C. or Virginia and calling someone in Maryland, you should not secretly record their phone call without their consent, because Maryland law doesn’t allow it, even though D.C. and Virginia do. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 11:32 am
This means that if you’re in a place where you don’t have privacy, you could face criminal charges for your actions. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 2:42 am
In her forthcoming article, The First Amendment Walks into a Bar: Trademark Registration and Free Speech, Notre Dame Law Review (download from her 43(B)log here), Professor Rebecca Tushnet argues that the CAFC got it wrong in In re Tam [THE SLANTS]. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:12 am
"... as they’re supposed to be. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:43 am
The Federal Circuit granted the motion to remand (In re Xencor Inc., No. 23-2048 (Fed. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 12:01 am
They give their lives meaning these are practices that people engage in because it means something to them. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 8:34 am
” In re La. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 4:02 am
But low probability doesn't mean no probability. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:12 am
Just because you know you’re in the right doesn’t mean that you should treat your case lightly. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 7:57 am
This too, while you're at it.) [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 1:37 pm
Since if we're writing probation conditions -- or anything else -- that read like that, we're in trouble.So I'm on completely board for Justice Rushing's sentiments. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 6:11 am
The case isn’t resolved by any means but thanks to your efforts, Alberto wasn’t deported this week. [read post]
