Search for: "In re Sullivan " Results 2461 - 2480 of 2,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 am
We're checking with our Sullivan sources. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 12:13 pm
It's not how Sullivan & Cromwell is going to lose Goldman Sachs as a client. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 2:28 pm
Ford Motor Company, a 16-page, 5-0 opinion, Justice Sullivan writes:A jury rendered a defense verdict on plaintiffs' product liability and negligence claims re-lating to the collapse of the roof of a Ford Explorer in a rollover accident. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 10:23 am
  It turns out the practice is widespread and spreading, and we're still waiting for a dept. to say anything negative - indeed, the superlatives are repetitious. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 5:17 am
I'm sure Mary Sullivan has had a positive influence on her athletes. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 2:57 pm by Stuart Levine
From Gilbert and Sullivan's Utopia, Limited, the song Limited Liability:MR. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
*Joy London reports that she's re-joined Sullivan & Cromwell, as senior manager, new program development. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 12:14 pm
[Andrew Sullivan; Instapundit; Ryan Sager] * When the subject of gay marriage comes up, social conservatives bring out a parade of horribles -- including polygamy. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 8:49 am
"We're in the process of working on waiver language that's going to be including in pleas, and if people are going to be interested in these pleas, they're going to have to waive those rights," Allen County Prosecutor Karen Richards said. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 3:58 am
They're called public defenders. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 9:31 am
If you're interested in some of the background, Danny's post announcing his leaving SEW back in August will help. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 4:39 am
  Simply put, the bigger your firm, the more likely you're going to start tripping over conflicts. [read post]
25 Sep 2006, 7:29 am
In the current issue of Legal Week, you can find both a breathless and statistics-distorting lead editorial, which I commend immediately to your e-dustbin (71% is "almost three-quarters," while 61% is "well under two-thirds"—how about the simpler truth that they're 10 percentage points, or about one part in seven, apart?) [read post]