Search for: "Individual Does 1-10" Results 2461 - 2480 of 14,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2018, 1:04 am
The principle that protection must be at a high level is stated explicitly in both the InfoSoc Directive (Recitals 4 and 9) and the Enforcement Directive (Recital 10).Second, the judgment refers to the Charter of Fundamental Rights. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 5:54 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The opposition division's decision was based on a main request and auxiliary request 1 and can be summarised as follows:Late-filed documents D17 to D20 were not admitted into the proceedings.Main request:Claims 1, 21 and 22 of the main request were identical to claims 1, 21 and 22 as granted and read as follows:"1. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:31 am by Inside Privacy
  This notification must be provided within 10 days after the discovery of the breach and at least 3 days prior to providing notice to individuals. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 3:55 am
" Further, the removal of the probationary employee from the payroll does not have to take effect on or before the last day of the applicable probationary period. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:50 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Second, it has a flat 20 percent tax on individual income that does not apply to personal dividend income. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 5:14 pm by Andrew Delaney
Ultimately, the Board required plaintiff to increase her bond limit and gave her 10 days to obtain the bond. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by Richard Zorza
Opinion by Justice Breyer (5-4), with Justice Kennedy joining the majority. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/10-10.pdf. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:34 am by Sasha Volokh
The Complaint Here Does Not Allege Facts Plausibly Suggesting Collusion Among the Defendant Banks A. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 8:24 pm by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
The Board pointed to § 1(7A) of the Workers’ Compensation Act, which states that the injured person does not have to meet this heightened requirement when the prior condition was also work-related. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:45 am by Michael Geist
While it might not surprise that the government maintains that Bill C-10 is consistent with the Charter, it is disappointing that the review does not engage with the central concerns that have emerged in recent weeks. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Monday’s argument, on whether federal law bars any challenge to the individual mandate and its attached penalty, will start at 10 a.m. and continue for 90 minutes. [read post]