Search for: "JOHN DOE-1" Results 2461 - 2480 of 14,275
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Given the underlying facts of the case, if the appellant does lose then she may rightly feel a deep sense of injustice, whatever the law. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
The Committee is seeking written submissions on all or any of the following questions: 1. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 9:48 am by Jane Chong
Addressing the detainees’ two more minor arguments in brief, the government contends that (1) the panel correctly determined that the defendants were acting within the scope of their employment, such that the United States properly substituted itself for the defendants under the Westfall Act, and that (2) the detainees forfeited any challenge to the dismissal of the “John Doe” defendants by failing to raise the claim in their appellate… [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:35 pm by Rick
  It indexes far more than just ebooks but it does boast that its collection includes over 1 million free digital editions. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:46 am by Kenan Farrell
McKenna of Woodhard, Emhardt, Moriarity, McNett & Henry, LLP Defendant:     Shannon Bartnick, Chris Bartnick, John and Jane Does 1-15 Cause:    Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Trademark Deceptive Consumer Sales Activities under Ind. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm by JB
”  It is a choice that is informed by the purposes of a constitution and the promotion of the kind of legitimacy (democratic, social, procedural, or moral) we want our government to have.Mike suggests, however, that his and John's theory of original methods originalism does not rest on value choices, but only on a desire for accuracy. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:25 am by Sheldon Toplitt
John Does 1-10 (Case No. 12-cv-0240) includes counts alleging libel, defamation, false advertising and false designation of origin in violation of the Lanham Act [15 U.S.C. sec. 1125(a)].As reported by paidContent.org., Paul's organization faces the high hurdle of proving actual malice in its defamation claim and daunting odds pursuing its trademark infringement count, but the candidate and his organization have been nothing if not surprising thus far in overcoming… [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:05 pm by Freda Carmack
Among the speakers were former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and John Yoo of 'torture memo' fame. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 2:01 am
From TMZ (via Overlawyered): Two anonymous plaintiffs are suing 20th Century Fox and One America Productions, claiming members of their college fraternity were interviewed to become part of the smash "Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan" film.The plaintiffs -- listed as John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 -- were allegedly assured the film would not be shown in the U.S. and their identities would not be… [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm by Fred Abrams
  As fully described by "UBS & Its 'John Doe' Summons", the IRS sought this information by serving the John Doe Summons depicted below:     (Click On Images To Enlarge)   Copyright 2009 Fred L. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:05 am by Kenan Farrell
John Doe d/b/a Gnarly Sporting Goods Court Case Number:    1:12-cv-00900-RLY-TAB File Date:    Friday, June 29, 2012 Plaintiff:     Indian Industries, Inc. d/b/a Escalade Sports Plaintiff Counsel:     Charles Johnson Meyer, William A. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 7:26 am by Kenan Farrell
Overhauser of Overhauser Law Offices, LLCDefendant: Amazon.com, Inc., John Does 1-50Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Unfair CompetitionCourt: Northern District of IndianaJudge: TBDReferred To: TBD Complaint: View this document on Scribd [read post]