Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 21,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2020, 10:32 am
In her complaint, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant was negligent in operating her vehicle and that she was liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 11:08 am
The Defendant was therefore liable for trade mark infringement. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 5:51 am
The Court held that, if the facts alleged as to the defendants are true, each defendant is an "employer" and thus liable for the unpaid wages. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 6:13 am
The Minnesota Court of Appeals pointed out that, with joint and several liability, each defendant is liable for a plaintiff's total recoverable damages even when a jury finds a defendant only partially at fault. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 10:38 am
For an earlier phase of the case, involving the defendant's attempt to litigate pseudonymously, see this post. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:05 am
A 5-justice majority in the Pentagon Papers case did say in dicta that, if the Times went ahead and published the materials, they might well be liable for prosecution under the Espionage Act. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:52 am
The Take-Away: A debt collector who communicates a misrepresentation of an amount owed on a consumer debt – though only to the consumer’s attorney – may still be liable under the FDCPA. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 6:09 pm
The complaint alleged that the employee had made defamatory statements and the employer was vicariously liable. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:29 am
However, the court agreed with the defendants that the record did not contain sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s award of actual damages or exemplary damages, nor was the trial court correct in ruling that the employer was liable for the gross negligence of the motorist under the circumstances (although the motorist would be liable for such damages, if the injured woman prevailed on remand). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:31 pm
I accept his explanation that he thought Bond was attending to the brake, but he should have made sure of this before moving the gears. [16] Given all the circumstances, and the respective degrees of fault, I find that the plaintiff should be held twenty-five percent liable for his injuries and that the defendants should be held seventy-five percent liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
Cratsley's testimony.Vega v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 12:15 pm
The appeals court concluded that the plaintiff’s declaration testimony indicated she had knowledge of enough facts, by observing them on the day she was injured, to cause her to believe the defendant may have been liable for her injuries. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 12:15 pm
The appeals court concluded that the plaintiff’s declaration testimony indicated she had knowledge of enough facts, by observing them on the day she was injured, to cause her to believe the defendant may have been liable for her injuries. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 6:10 am
In Texas, the law has changed to make the trucker’s employer or the rig’s owner liable only if the admissible evidence shows gross negligence on the part of the corporation. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:11 pm
Despite plaintiff’s efforts, the evidence adduced showed that the plaintiff in fact purchased multiple policies from multiple insurers. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:27 pm
The defendant in this case has filed for a motion seeking summary judgment against the plaintiff’s complaint. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:13 pm
This case involves several defendants who are accused of infringing the plaintiff’s patents related to elevator devices and methods. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 4:52 pm
Moreover, if a defendant dies, plaintiffs or their representatives may recoup damages from the defendant’s estate. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:15 pm
“The court is entitled to have regard to the practical problems facing defendants who have to face the sort of detailed inquiries into the responsibility of their conduct many years ago which such a defence [qualified privilege] entails” (paragraph 111). [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 3:33 am
If, on the one hand it was because the debris was open and obvious, then it was not the attorney's fault. [read post]
