Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2022, 3:55 am
The authors’ research corroborated the theory that more progressive state tax structures cannot achieve redistribution of income in the long run. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 7:54 pm
Newman v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:52 pm
Broadly, they can be labeled as “constitutionalists,” a term I have long heard, but ill-defined. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:47 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
CLEVENS, Appellant, v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Long Beach, 173 Cal. 765, 772 (1916), Phillips v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
All this in a state – Illinois – where the highest court forbids FDCA-based common-law causes of action (see Martin v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:42 am
United States, "[N]ever before has the United States sought to enjoin a newspaper from publishing information in its possession. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Ezendam B.V. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
The United States Department of Transportation estimates that human error accounted for 94% of these crashes. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am
Importantly, the Report is the only publication of its kind in the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:28 am
Importantly, the Report is the only publication of its kind in the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
The new false marking statute will limit lawsuits to being filed only by the government or those that can show a competitive injury from the false marking: (1) IN GENERAL- Section 292 of title 35, United States Code, is amended– (A) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: ‘Only the United States may sue for the penalty authorized by this subsection. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
Langdell was a United States resident and the first and second defendant companies were incorporated in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968), holding that an alleged statement by a co-defendant was not incriminating on its face to the defendant; that sufficient evidence supported the defendants’ convictions; and that because one of the defendants performed the same or similar role within the conspiracy as his codefendants, he was not less culpable than most other participants in his relative conduct, he was not entitled to a minor role reduction under § 3B1.2. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:10 pm
[7] Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
In Martin et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
As our state's highest court noted in that opinion:To trigger further judicial scrutiny, an aggrieved shareholder-tenant must make a showing that the board acted (1) outside the scope of its authority, (2) in a way that did not legitimately further the corporate purpose or (3) in bad faith.Since he couldn't prove the existence of at least one of these three factors, Pelton's case could not survive. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:09 pm
Ct. 1659 (2013), as well as Lubbe v. [read post]
