Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 8:15 pm
Nevertheless, as exemplified by the United States and Canadian Supreme Court cases, Diamond v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:12 pm
That's certainly true at the Supreme Court.The case is United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am
Finally, a review of the details of the decision follows: Background of Pyott case: In September 2010, Allergan, Inc. entered into a settlement with the United States Department of Justice and pled guilty to criminal misdemeanor misbranding and paid a total of $600 million in civil and criminal fees. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 5:07 am
” The standard was further refined by a succession of Supreme Court cases, including United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm
Bullock in which the court said the holding in Citizens United applies to Montana (and presumably the other 49 states). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 5:15 pm
This has stuck in my craw for a long time. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:09 pm
Although Montana’s law was intended to combat corruption in election spending, the five-justice majority held in a paragraph-long decision that this case was controlled by Citizens United, which found that independent expenditures by corporations “do not give rise to corruption. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm
Creative Commons © Images_of_Money The Supreme Court held today in its long-anticipated decision in Christopher v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
The list of the application's evaluation questions, alone, is 41 pages long. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit also noted that even though the United States Supreme Court has instructed that Section 10(b) be construed “flexibly to effectuate its remedial purposes” (SEC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
The Eleventh Circuit also noted that even though the United States Supreme Court has instructed that Section 10(b) be construed “flexibly to effectuate its remedial purposes” (SEC v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:54 am
In the case of Healthcare Retirement Corporation of America v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
In granting a stay of a Montana Supreme Court decision upholding that state’s anticorruption laws, Justice Ginsburg, writing with Justice Breyer, found the pulse of the chaos Citizens United has wrought: “Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:16 am
But the Supreme Court, in FEC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 10:50 am
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am
Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. [read post]
