Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 3:15 am
New York : Facts On File, 2012 3 v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 In the wake of France’s apparently unencumbered expulsion of individuals on public interest grounds there has been a fresh outcry from the press about the shackles imposed by the Human Rights Convention on the UK authorities which other signatory states seem to ignore with impunity. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:06 am
Lord Justice Rix is driving forward the scheme as part of the Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger’s aim to revitalise the CAMS scheme. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:47 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Stangroom & Anor v Brown [2012] EWCA Civ 424 (04 April 2012) Foley Independent News & Media Ltd & Ors v Lord Ashcroft KCMG [2012] EWCA Civ 423 (04 April 2012) Salimi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 422 (04 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Jeeg Global Ltd v Hare [2012] EWHC 871 (QB) (04 April 2012) Burn… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:38 am
(I'm not saying here that in fact this is true; I'm merely stating this as hypothesis). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:09 am
Lord Mance, in giving the lead judgment, stated that: “the only approach, consistent with the nature and underlying purpose of these insurances both before and after the [1969 Act], is one which looks to the initiation or causation of the accident or disease which injured the employee. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 1:11 am
Lord Justice ThorpeThe case of Lawrence v Gallagher [2012] EWCA Civ 394, decided today, has caused a number of headlines, primarily because it is said to be the first substantial appeal concerning financial orders made following the dissolution of a Civil Partnership. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
Lord Hunt, chair of the Press Complaints Commission gave the keynote at a seminar marking its publication on Friday. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
I regarded the appeal as having merit and I also considered that it would give this court the opportunity to give any necessary guidance as to the limits of the application of the observations of Lord Neuberger in Holmes-Moorhouse v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
I regarded the appeal as having merit and I also considered that it would give this court the opportunity to give any necessary guidance as to the limits of the application of the observations of Lord Neuberger in Holmes-Moorhouse v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
As Lord Somervell noted in Chappell v Nestlé, half a century ago “A peppercorn does not cease to be good consideration if it is established that the promisee does not like pepper and will throw away the corn. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
We note that Lord Phillips in Spiller v Joseph also doubted the need for this requirement…Any article 8 concerns are properly the subject of the law governing privacy, not defamation. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:49 am
At that time the domestic case law – and in particular the High Court decision in Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2006] EWHC 356 and the Court of Appeal in R (Takoushis) v Inner North London Coroner and Another [2005] EWCA Civ 1440 – stated that the death by his own hand or actions of a person who was not formally detained by the state could not (other than in particular circumstances not applicable in Mr Reynolds case)… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:01 am
Presumably those set out by Lord Neuberger in the House of Lords (at [57]) take on greater resonance? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Mukasey, Diallo v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court said in 1895, in Coffin v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
Tugendhat J refused to make such a determination (Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB)). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:42 am
Barr v. [read post]
