Search for: "Mark Roberts"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 10,081
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2019, 3:30 am
Pamela Samuelson & Mark P. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:40 pm
“Supreme Court strikes down violent criminal provision, rules against newspaper seeking food stamps data”: Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this report. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:12 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court sides with ‘subversive’ clothing designer in First Amendment case. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:59 pm
” Chief Justice John Roberts also focused on narrower statutory language in his divided opinion. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Sotomayor dissented in part, agreeing with the Government’s position that the term “scandalous” (but not “immoral”) as used in the statute is susceptible to a narrowing construction that could prohibit only those marks that offend because of their mode of expression (e.g., profanity) without necessarily reaching the ideas or viewpoints they convey. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Sotomayor dissented in part, agreeing with the Government’s position that the term “scandalous” (but not “immoral”) as used in the statute is susceptible to a narrowing construction that could prohibit only those marks that offend because of their mode of expression (e.g., profanity) without necessarily reaching the ideas or viewpoints they convey. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
Justices Sotomayor, Breyer, and Roberts all dissented from the majority opinion in that they all believe the offending portions of the Lanham Act should simply be narrowly construed as to apply only to obscene, vulgar, or profane trademarks. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
Justices Sotomayor, Breyer, and Roberts all dissented from the majority opinion in that they all believe the offending portions of the Lanham Act should simply be narrowly construed as to apply only to obscene, vulgar, or profane trademarks. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
Justices Sotomayor, Breyer, and Roberts all dissented from the majority opinion in that they all believe the offending portions of the Lanham Act should simply be narrowly construed as to apply only to obscene, vulgar, or profane trademarks. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
Justices Sotomayor, Breyer, and Roberts all dissented from the majority opinion in that they all believe the offending portions of the Lanham Act should simply be narrowly construed as to apply only to obscene, vulgar, or profane trademarks. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
Justices Sotomayor, Breyer, and Roberts all dissented from the majority opinion in that they all believe the offending portions of the Lanham Act should simply be narrowly construed as to apply only to obscene, vulgar, or profane trademarks. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
Justices Sotomayor, Breyer, and Roberts all dissented from the majority opinion in that they all believe the offending portions of the Lanham Act should simply be narrowly construed as to apply only to obscene, vulgar, or profane trademarks. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
Roberts has an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:52 am
The term suggested by that mark is not needed to express any idea and, in fact, as commonly used today, generally signifies nothing except emotion and a severely limited vocabulary.Three separate opinions dissenting in part were filed-- one by Chief Justice Roberts, one by Justice Breyer and one by Justice Sotomayor joined by Justice Breyer. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
There are 3 opinions that concur in part and dissent in part, one by Roberts, one by Breyer, and one by Sotomayor. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:04 am
” Chief Justice Roberts further explained: “The First Amendment protects the freedom of speech; it does not require the Government to give aid and comfort to those using obscene, vulgar, and profane modes of expression. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
On this score, Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Sotomayor disagreed. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
” Mark Walsh has an first-hand look at Friday’s opinion announcements for this blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 10:40 am
” Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Court tosses black man’s murder conviction over racial bias. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:13 pm
As the majority points out, the graves of those who died in WWI were marked with either a cross or a star of David. [read post]
