Search for: "Marks v. Thomas" Results 2461 - 2480 of 2,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am by charonqc
“The following seven paragraphs have been redacted [It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer. v)  It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:19 am by charonqc
The point was ably demonstrated by Mark Howard QC who obtained a similar degree from the same college for his pet dog Lulu. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:06 am
- Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, Six Continents Hotels, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am by Erin Miller
  In doing so, she will be following the path that Justices Marshall and Thomas, each in differing ways, marked out before her. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:23 pm
Georgia and then validating new death penalty statutes in Gregg v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
Dassault Systemes Solidworks Corp (Internet Cases)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – iPad v iPad – Fujitsu’s Jan 2002 filing for IPAD for 'handheld computing device for wireless networking in a retail environment’ (Trademark Blog) HTC – Potential trademark dispute brewing between HTC and ShoreTel over their taglines, respectively ‘Quietly Brilliant’ and ‘Brilliantly… [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:25 am
Cir. 2005)) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:36 am by Steve Hall
A concurring opinion cited an investigation of jury selection by The News as evidence that discrimination continued to be a problem in the criminal justice system.Related posts are in the race index; more on Batson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by Adam Thierer
Under this statutory standard, as FTC Commissioner Thomas Rosch has argued, the commission must carefully consider: [the] legitimate pro-consumer and pro-competitive benefits that result from [targeted advertising]. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 11:56 am by Steve Hall
And, this excerpt refers to Democrat Thomas V. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 10:29 am by Jonathan Bailey
Note: Commenter Åsk Dabitch reminded me I omitted the Kelly v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm by Marvin Ammori
O'Connor wrote the principal dissent for Justices Thomas, Scalia, and Ginsburg; but Rehnquist was in the majority. [read post]