Search for: "Matter of Lawrence"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 2,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 10:05 am
For the convenience of this Court, the relevant statements in the hearings, in the Congressional reports, and on the floor of the House and Senate are collected in the brief of Appellant Lawrence Velvel, with the relevant pages set forth in their entirety in the Addendum to his brief. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Most appellate courts that have recently considered the matter have so held as to libel as well. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
We have Justice Barrett who joined the Alito opinion and a concurring opinion by Justice Thomas that expressly suggests that decisions like Obergefell, Griswold and Lawrence need review. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm
Also, even if the FTC is looking into the matter, there’s not much transparency about where they are in the process or how serious they are. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
” As a general matter, the state observes, stare decisis is “at its weakest” when courts are interpreting the Constitution, because the democratically elected branches have no recourse (short of a constitutional amendment) to correct a court’s erroneous constitutional interpretation. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In finally reversing and remanding after its 2012 grant of review, the Supreme Court in its majority opinion made a number of key points: As a foundational matter, the Court treated the CEQA Guidelines as binding regulatory mandates. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:13 pm
Lawrence: [C]ompelled speech is [not] always unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am
Next, if he is to be an effective Machiavellian jurist, he will need to be artful in matters ranging from what he wri [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:18 pm
This is an important article, which has already received notice from Lawrence Solum and Jack Balkin, among others. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm
And don’t laugh… that’s pretty much what they thought… and still think for that matter. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:57 pm
Aldrich’s “true” intent is being ignored as a matter of law. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:25 am
Wade and Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Jonathan Joseph is a member of the California State Bar and has focused for over 33 years on regulatory, corporate, securities and transactional matters for banks and bank holding companies and officers and directors of distressed and failed institutions. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 5:01 am
Whether this was done before, or because, things were looking dim at the firms, is a matter which escapes memory. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
It was a family law matter. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
As a matter of history, Supreme Court Justices rarely lose retention elections unless they have written controversial opinions or if the court itself has recently been involved in some sort of controversy. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:00 pm
Authenticity matters. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am
Over at IPWatchdog they have a summary of this week's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing (video recording) on the STRONGER Patents Act, a bill primarily (but not exclusively) put forward and promoted by Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.). [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
by Michael C. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Supreme Court ruled that sodomy could be a crime, and it was not until 2003, two years after my book came out, that the Justices reversed themselves in Lawrence v. [read post]
