Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 11:03 pm
But it doesn't matter to the conclusion. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm
BMJ and Deer should have no trouble whatsoever meeting that definition — the complaint targets speech about a classic matter of public concern. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:59 am
Sperling), and more than $1 million to relocate Sean B. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
See the 2011 C&D letter, the 2006 C&D letter and the 2006 C&D response. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm
Huey; Division C – The Honorable Catherine M. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 10:47 am
Sure, I'm going to kill this guy. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am
(a) Exclusion Amount- (1) IN GENERAL- Subparagraph (A) of section 2010(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘$5,000,000’ and inserting ‘$1,000,000’. (2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT- Subparagraph (B) of section 2010(c)(3) of such Code is amended– (A) by striking ‘2011’ in the matter preceding clause (i) and inserting ‘2012’, and (B) by striking ‘2010’ in clause (ii) and… [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:19 am
YouTube opinion did: a service provider must be aware of specific infringing material to have the ability to control that infringing activity within the meaning of § 512(c)(1)(B). [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 7:17 pm
In such cases, the matter goes to a hearing in a regional office and the NLRB Regional Director decides the question and sets the election. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
I’m not just talking about the severity of the crisis; I’m talking about the amount of misinformation and utter confusion about its proximate cause. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
Veoh was originally posted on Copyhype FootnotesSee, for example, A & M Records v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
WREN, INDIVIDUALLY, SLUSSER & FROST, L.L.P., WILLIAM C. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:44 pm
OK, what civil actions for violations are described in paragraph 103(a)(1)(C)? [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:44 pm
(C) either— ?? [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:26 pm
District Court Judge James M. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Articles 34 and 36 of the Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: The Court's Discretion Amokura Kawharu Faculty of Law, University of Auckland Abstract: The opening paragraph of art 34(2) Model Law provides that “an arbitral award may be set aside by the court…”. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Canadian homeowners, residents, industry, regulators and appellate courts really do need certainty on the following key issues: (i) the threshold effect for liability m nuisance m the context of environmental or contamination; (ii) the requirements for a “non-natural” use ofland; (iii) whether environmental statutory regimes are a complete code of liability; and (iv) whether property devaluation should be a recognized claim in nuisance. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
1 Though I’m encouraged that opponents of the existing bills recognize the harm that online commercial piracy causes creators, I think the OPEN Act resembles too much the latter. [read post]
