Search for: "Miller, v. United States" Results 2461 - 2480 of 2,645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2008, 5:02 am
I understand that CAAF is having some trouble with its web site, so I am posting this link to CAAF's decision from yesterday in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:15 am
District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Renhcol, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 11:53 pm
Here is the Abstract:The United States Supreme Court's decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 10:11 pm
Here is the abstract:The United States Supreme Court's decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]
13 Apr 2008, 4:23 pm
US or Miller's in The Slaughterhouse Cases, for some people who actively participate in Balkinization discussions, Blackmun in Roe v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 8:03 am
United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951), and The Steel Seizure Case, 343 U.S. 579 (1952).Minton had the good sense to leave after seven years on the Court. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 6:55 pm
Filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the Complaint alleged that Herman Miller used its Suggested Retail Price policy to enforce a resale price maintenance scheme over the Aeron chairs. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 1:05 pm
But the fact of the matter is that it is, in fact, the United States military that is in control of these detainees. [read post]