Search for: "People v. Eugene"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
” Cocchi v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
The point has been made thoroughly and very persuasively by co-blogger Eugene: “[T]he freedom … of the press” specially protects the press as an industry, which is to say newspapers, television stations, and the like — so have argued some judges and scholars, such as the Citizens United v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:01 pm
From Morland-Jones v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 9:22 am
In Rumsfeld v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:33 am
Purdy * Bosley Medical Institute v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:51 am
” And indeed, in a comment to Eugene’s post, this deed evoked similar feelings: “People have paid high prices for that. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:09 pm
Johnson (1989) and United States v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 11:32 am
We noted this anomaly in Cox Broadcasting [v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 10:52 am
The unpublished nature of the work undermines that in some measure (see, e.g., Harper & Row v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 2:04 pm
The strongest precedent for Dina would be Worldwide Church of God v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
In People v Dietze (75 NY2d 47 [1989]), this Court struck down a similar harassment statute, former Penal Law § 240.25, which prohibited the use of abusive or obscene language with the intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person. [read post]
13 May 2014, 12:58 pm
So holds New York’s highest court in upholding most of the impersonation and forgery convictions in the Raphael Golb/Dead Sea Scrolls case (People v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 11:40 am
From Gunn Hill Dairy v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:11 pm
They are listed in the people’s Constitution. [read post]
7 May 2014, 1:22 pm
From Wednesday’s New Hampshire Supreme Court opinion in Montenegro v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:23 am
According to the well-known antebellum case, Corfield v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:04 am
Justice Kennedy, to the extent anyone wrote for the Court, glossed over the big issue of Marsh v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 2:28 pm
And in Gay Law Students Ass’n v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:39 pm
Yet errors in Supreme Court opinions are more common than people realize, as Eugene noted here. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:55 am
In Marsh v. [read post]
