Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 2461 - 2480 of 178,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2018, 9:44 am by Abbie Peterson
On August 3, 2018, the case was administratively closed by order granting Weyerhaeuser’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay This Action. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As the trial judge wrote in rejecting plaintiff's post-trial efforts to recover the medical expenses, "the jury's findings are consistent with a possibility that the jury based its damages verdict solely on Crea's taunting of Humphrey and tackling him to the ground rather than Crea's infliction of a particular blows that caused medical expenses. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:57 pm
  After back to back defense verdicts in patent cases in recent weeks the plaintiffs scored a win yesterday in Pioneer v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:11 pm by Ray Beckerman
I.e., any defendant who wants to try to prevent Time Warner from disclosing his or her name and address to the plaintiff must disclose his name and address to the plaintiff. [?!] [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:33 am
., who has served as vice-chair of ATLA's aviation section among other honors in representing the plaintiff's bar, writes in Florida's Daily Business Review taking issue with some of his colleagues' doomsaying about the Class Action Fairness Act, which he says has proved "no calamity after all":More than two years after President Bush signed CAFA into law, these concerns are proving to be greatly exaggerated. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 7:50 am by Ansara Law Personal Injury Attorneys
It’s important that you and your attorney consider any pre-trial settlement offers carefully, as declining a defense settlement offer in a case later favorably decided for the defense could result in an order for YOU to pay the defense’s attorney fees. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:39 am by Jay
  CAOC commented, “This bill brings an end to 30 years of inequality for non-citizen plaintiffs in California. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:34 am
In determining that the plaintiff was excluded from the class and could therefore assert the same claims as the class, the court reasoned that (1) the plaintiff's name was on the list of persons excluded from class membership; (2) the district court handling the class action had waived the plaintiff's violation of the deadline for exclusion; and (3) the defendant could have argued in the class action that the plaintiff should not be on… [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 8:27 am by Eric Goldman
To get around the obvious Section 230 problem that the plaintiffs’ claims are actually based on the third party’s harassing content, the plaintiffs affirmatively disclaimed that they were suing based on the harasser’s messages or Snap’s failure to block him. [read post]
27 Aug 2024, 6:22 am by Eugene Volokh
(I should also note that the reason I'm not mentioning plaintiff's name  or the name of the plaintiff's employer is that it's no longer part of the case title, and I see no reason to publicize the name any more than necessary. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 10:02 am
Anderson at University of Texas (Austin), the plaintiffs argue that bias is evident from a couple of factors:  First, defendants won 87% of tort cases in the Texas Supreme Court in 2004 and 2005, a fact that Anderson argues cannot be explained by (1) the court's having left plaintiff victories in the courts of appeals undisturbed; (2) the correction of rogue courts of appeals; or (3) the implementation of tort reform legislation. [read post]
Thus, the court decided that the lower court was improper to dismiss the plaintiffs claim based on the waiver. [read post]