Search for: "Research In Motion Limited"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,047
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm
Redlightning failed to request a limiting instruction. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:46 am
Bayer might be right, but that’s not for the court to decide on a motion to dismiss. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
Reebye should be limited in his report to “criticizing the methodology or the research or pointing out facts apparent from the records which the other examiners may have overlooked” based on Justice Savage’s apparent reliance on C.N. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 7:23 am
Our client, a research scientist and mathmetician, had signed a limited non-compete agreement and confidentiality agreement, but his former employer argued that he had taken confidential and proprietary documents before leaving his former job, and that he was likely to disclose those secrets to his new employer. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:49 pm
Number 7 provides that a court may order "a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information not be revealed o [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm
The Court found that the motion was brought ten years after the conviction, well outside the three year time limit for such motions, but that the government had waived its objection to the untimeliness of the motion by failing to object to it, and so the district court properly decided the motion on its merits. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
LEXIS 21675 (4th Cr 10/20/2010) (unpublished) “Applying the North Carolina statute of limitations for personal injury actions to the inmate’s 42 U.S.C.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:06 am
If doctors have limited immunity from medical malpractice lawsuits based upon their following "evidence-based guidelines," they could invoke this protection on their say-so. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:20 am
If a request is limited, the limitation must be carefully tailored to the type of information sought and the legal and factual issues that are important in the case. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am
I have read all of the legal papers submitted in the case related to the stay (located on the Ninth Circuit website).The government makes some valid points in its motion for a stay. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:19 pm
The capabilities of satellite systems were discussed, in areas including land motion measurement, pollution and oil spill. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
However, the Court noted, the rule did not otherwise limit the court’s discretion. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 3:07 am
(IPKat) (PatLit) (IAM) EU patent: Translation into ‘language customary in the field of international technological research’ (ip:jur) EU patent: Italy joining Spain in fight against three-languages-regime (ip:jur) CJEU – DHL Express (France) v.Chronopost - territorial scope of the injunction granted by a community trademark court (EPLAW) Database on geographical indications protected in the European Community for spirits (IPKat) France Court of Appeal: Treves v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 3:05 pm
Bill did a steller job researching, briefing and arguing Ms. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:22 pm
Although there are limitations to the data reported here, they are more than we have had before, and they call attention to the costs of heightened pleading even as they suggest avenues for further research. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:14 pm
On December 9, 2008, the district court granted Honeywell's motion for summary judgment of invalidity of claims 1, 5, 7, 10, and 11 of the '817 patent and denied Solvay's motion for summary judgment of no invalidity. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided in the week of 10/01/10: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court City of Aberdeen v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:15 pm
Motorola also states that it had previously asserted the ‘333 and ‘317 patents against Research In Motion Limited and Research In Motion Corporation (collectively, “RIM”) at the ITC in an investigation styled Certain Wireless Communications System Server Software, Wireless Handheld Devices and Battery Packs, Inv. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:14 am
To my recollection, this list would be a vast improvement over what my old firm’s limited subscription offered. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:55 pm
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) and the Respondents are Research In Motion, Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation (collectively, “RIM”), and Apple Inc. [read post]
