Search for: "SCALES v. STATE"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 4,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
In the middle are a small group of academic theorists who see value and resilience in the state but understand that the ideological pretensions of the Westphalian system have become unrealistic in a world now ordered through governance frameworks of a number of actors only some of which are states. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
Cases that may be of interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:25 am
Gorsuch does not fit on a normal ideological scale. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 1:54 pm
See Odom v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am
Q: On April 21, 2022, the Supreme Court in Cassirer v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:33 am
Scales back retirement contributions – The State of Texas will scale back the amount it contributes to each employee’s retirement account from 6.95 percent to 6.0 percent. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm
The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am
This decision, Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 (discussed here), found that s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, which had been in operation for the past 36 years having been inserted by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976, was contrary to the Constitution. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
Cautious Co v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 12:20 pm
State, 36 A.D.3d 297].Part F -Establish a Sliding Scale for Health InsuranceIf adopted, this bill would, effective January 1, 2009, provide that the share of health insurance premiums paid by new retirees would be based on years of service. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am
Given their stated concern about the need to license non-essential patents belonging to SEP owners, the draft regulation is counterproductive for their purposes. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:55 am
(IBM v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
