Search for: "STATE v. LAWRENCE" Results 2461 - 2480 of 3,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Indeed, Core has stated that it ‘expects to rely on Qualcomm source code for most, if not all, of the thirteen standard-essential patents asserted against LG. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court ruled that sodomy could be a crime, and it was not until 2003, two years after my book came out, that the Justices reversed themselves in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:00 am by Jane Chong
Recognizing how narrowly the order defines sanctuary jurisdictions is helpful in avoiding unnecessary rabbit holes, like the recurring suggestion that, for purposes of fighting Trump’s executive order, the § 1983 Third Circuit case Galarza v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage comes from Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Ariane de Vogue at CNN, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters and Robert Barnes in The Washington Post. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Lawrence Testing v Lanark Leeds Distribution Ltd., 2019 CanLII 69697 https://t.co/pMVpHXRNUV 2019-07-31 Katy Perry and others found guilty of copyright infringement https://t.co/7gSTldlxDN 2019-07-31 Artist Sues Ellen DeGeneres, Walmart Over "Love" Logo On EV1 Apparel Line https://t.co/qNbKwNdazE 2019-07-31 Artificial Intelligence And Autonomous Systems Legal Update (2Q19) https://t.co/zNPh43yA0W 2019-07-31 Microsoft invests $1 billion in OpenAI to develop AI technologies… [read post]
21 May 2008, 4:36 am
Connecticut (where the Court held that the state must waive court fees for poor people seeking a divorce) or Tennessee v. [read post]