Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2018, 4:16 pm
On 26 April 2018, Warby J heard an application in the case of Miah v BBC. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
(c) In how many libel appeals did Eady J, Tugendhat J or Sharp J appear on the panel? [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:48 pm
Last Term, in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 1:03 pm
In a recent published California district court decision, Memorial Health Services v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
From State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:47 pm
Policy in MIGHT V. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:22 am
") had cited any of Sir Robin Jacob's judicial utterances in the RoHo cushions litigation or L'Oréal v Bellure, but could not do so without a page-by-page hunt for them [Says Merpel: the IPKat won't tell you, but I will: Ansgar indeed mentioned both cases]. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:02 am
In the summer of 2006, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals invalidated the 2004 registration provision in Goldstein v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
The appellate court agreed, in Sweet v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:12 am
Microsoft begins its petition by invoking the ancient Supreme Court precedent, White v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 7:15 pm
With respect to the government’s current view on the Rule 9(b) heightened pleading standard in the FCA context, the Supreme Court recently requested a government brief expected to be filed by the U.S. solicitor general in Estate of Helmly v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 3:15 am
The case of Peruta v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:51 am
Town, FBI Special Agent in Charge Johnnie Sharp Jr., and Drug Enforcement Administration Assistant Special Agent in Charge Clay Morris. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 4:15 am
The defense appealed, arguing that the award was excessive; however, in Pinto v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:49 pm
In today’s case (Clements v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 6:24 pm
I didn't expect such a sharp slap in the face! [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 7:40 am
Additional Resources: Schaefer v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
If neither Churchill or Coolidge inspire you, perhaps Jimmy V can do it. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:19 am
The decision holds the EEOC subject to the same limitations period applicable to individual claimants in any Title VII context.The case at issue, EEOC v. [read post]
