Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2022, 10:51 pm
Samsung and Oracle v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:34 pm
The Court’s opinion in Vermont Yankee v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Polarization moves in cycles, and this nation experienced a cycle when a period of high polarization began at the end of the 19th century, with a sharp rise in inequality during the Gilded Age. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Among the cases he worked on in the 1953 term was Barsky v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 8:49 am
Jurata provided a quick overview of the FTC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
Specifically, as Kavanaugh wrote in TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm
In Boumediene v. [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 2:53 pm
Accord Sammons v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Lewis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
The question, in large part, was the significance of Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council [2016] AC 811, at paras 78 and 79 “78. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
In Fisher v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
On 7 February 2023, the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Singh and Warby LJJ) heard an appeal in the case of Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
On 21 June 2017 Warby J heard an application in the case of RJH v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm
In the case of Versi v express.co.uk IPSO found that there had been no code breach. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
On 20 February 2015, the Court of Appeal (McCombe and Sharp LJJ and Mitting J) gave judgment in the case of Rufus v Elliott ([2015] EWCA Civ 121). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:21 am
Retractable Technologies, Incorporated v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
As early as 1928, the Court had indicated that it did not regard this sharp line as sustainable. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
(Patent Docs) Cubicin (Daptomycin) – US: Cubist Pharmaceuticals to oppose Teva’s attempt to add inequitable conduct defense in patent infringement action (SmartBrief) Dorzolamide/Timolol – Netherlands: Preliminary injunction judge rules UK invalidity decision not sufficient to rule non-negligible chance that (Dutch part of) patent will be invalidated in proceedings on the merits: Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 5:12 pm
He relied on Belokon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
The Dutch court's reasoning in the parallel case was consistent with the English Court (save they actually granted the relief sought, whereas Kitchin J held that the case for the declaration was arguable) (see Merck Sharpe & Dohme Manufacturing v Ratiopharm Nederland BV and others - February 13 2008 case number/docket number 288241/ HA ZA 07-1689).A new mantra for those clearing the path? [read post]
