Search for: "State, in Interest of Jr" Results 2461 - 2480 of 5,807
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 11:16 pm by editor
  The winners reflect a full range of diverse interests and backgrounds, with women pursuing opportunities in public interest, academia, and private sector in every region of the country. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:40 am by admin
Article 18 requires signatory states to mutually recognize each other’s copyrights, and to grant copyright protection to foreign works retroactively, even if they had been treated as public domain works until then. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:14 am by Steve Bainbridge
Buckley, Jr., the National Review, and Barry Goldwater’s 1964 campaign. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:23 am by Lori J. Paul, AACP
Prine Jr. issued a ruling which included an injunction applicable only to William. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Investigators painted a picture of loose oversight on lobbyists, developer favoritism, and influence peddling by Disneyland Resort interests through the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
The year 2017 produced several interesting privilege issues. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
The year 2017 produced several interesting privilege issues. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:25 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
The Connecticut Supreme Court was asked to consider several issues of state law that had been certified to it from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:02 pm by Michele Simon
Douglas, Jr., senior vice president and global chief customer Officer, Coca-Cola Each of these companies relies heavily on genetically engineered ingredients to make its products, so it’s really no mystery what’s going on. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 3:48 am by JURIST Staff
One might think a government official joining an anti-government organization would be an irreconcilable conflict of interest. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:46 pm by Suzanne Ito
Fortunately the Court rejected this invitation to return to the bad old days of Jim Crow, and ruled that classifying prisoners by race is permissible only if the state can show that doing so is "narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest" – a showing no state has been able to make. [read post]