Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 3,526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
As I discussed in previous articles, earlier this year the United States Supreme Court adopted the "cat's paw" theory in federal cases, and the New Jersey Appellate Division adopted the cat's paw theory in November 2008. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
Ed. 2d 140 (1977); State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:13 am
United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932). [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:43 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court appointed a Special Master to review the legal standard for the admissibility of eyewitness testimony known as the “Manson test,” established by the United States Supreme Court in 1977 and fully embraced by 48 out of 50 states, including New Jersey in 1988 in State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:33 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruling in State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:07 pm
The opinion in State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:58 am
(See Swarthout v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:19 am
Last month, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the much-anticipated Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:16 am
United States leave little doubt that a U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 9:33 am
The plaintiff in this case was an employee of the United States Army who received a poor evaluation from his supervisor. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 8:24 am
But the manufacturer had actively encouraged its distributor to market the product throughout the United States, and the manufacturer's officers had attended sales conventions in the U.S. alongside buyers from New Jersey. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:48 pm
State of New Jersey v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
United States, 2011 U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:17 am
Attorney's Office District of New Jersey on August 11, 2011 released the following: "MINT POLICE OFFICER ARRESTED, CHARGED IN NEW JERSEY FOR ALLEGED DISABILITY FRAUD CAMDEN, N.J. - A police officer employed by the U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 7:17 am
Attorney's Office District of New Jersey on August 11, 2011 released the following: "MINT POLICE OFFICER ARRESTED, CHARGED IN NEW JERSEY FOR ALLEGED DISABILITY FRAUD CAMDEN, N.J. - A police officer employed by the U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 5:19 am
’” United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
My guess, incidentally, is that if a state supreme court wanted to appoint a lawyer to brief and argue this sort of case pro bono (see, e.g., this example from New Jersey) — especially when the case is on an interesting issue and has a relatively compact record — it should have no difficulty finding someone willing to take on such a task, given that a state supreme court argument is usually seen as interesting and prestigious. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:40 am
" Initially, the district court noted that Rembrandt is a New Jersey limited liability partnership with offices in Pennsylvania and no facilities in Texas. [read post]
