Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 23,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2012, 7:14 am
The Supreme Court's decision in the Stolen Valor Act case, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:45 pm
In Marmet Health Care Center v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:45 pm
In Marmet Health Care Center v. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
The state had previously attempted to execute him by lethal injection in 2022.With Miller’s death, this country has now executed 1,600 people since the United States Supreme Court revived capital punishment in its 1976 Gregg v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:34 am
The President of the Maryland Senate, Democrat Thomas V. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 10:15 am
United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:37 am
The European Court of Human Rights ruled on May 27 in N v. the United Kingdom, Application No. 26565/05, that the United Kingdom's demand that a Ugandan woman living with AIDS return to her home country does not violate the U.K.'s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:41 pm
This issue is being litigated all over the country right now thanks to a clash of two recent Fourth Amendment cases, Herring v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court, he heard the case Brown v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 1:02 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
By Eric Goldman Trout Point Lodge, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:21 pm
And the 38 page decision in Board of County Commissioners of Washington County v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm
This post concerns the Opinion of the Advocate General in Case C-362/14: Schrems v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:50 pm
This was interpreted as a sort of treaty between the Commonwealth countries in O’Donohue v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:06 am
Arizona v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:06 am
Arizona v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:35 am
Since he was aged 19, in principle AP qualified for leave to remain under rule 276ADE(1)(v) and it was thus possible to dispose of the appeal by agreement failing which it fell to be considered in accordance with the law stated in the court’s judgment without passing an order. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
State v. [read post]
