Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2012, 5:30 am
Intentional torts under the Texas Tort Claims Act TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE-COMMUNITY JUSTICE ASSISTANCE DIVISION v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 2:38 pm
The two words were brought together in the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, in Population Diagnostics Inc v The Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2012] EWHC 3541 (Ch), a decision from last Thursday by Mr Justice Warren in an appeal against the refusal of Mrs Chalmers, on behalf of the UK's Intellectual Property Office, to grant two somewhat curious patent applications. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:48 am
Martha Elizabeth, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:04 pm
In reaching this conclusion, the trial court relied on what it characterized as the "procedures" mandated by the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:41 am
Appeal before the Supreme Court? [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:18 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
Amanda Marzullo: I'm looking forward to discussing Ex Parte Pena, which is one of the most divisive decisions we've seen from the Court of Criminal Appeals in a while.First up, Scott's holiday poem was a reference to US v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 1:30 am
Wolff and Gottlieb v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
* A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again) The Court of Appeal for England and Wales has just issued its decision in Specsavers v Asda, a very well-known saga the previous episodes of which have been severally covered by the IPKat [on initial skirmishes, here and here; on the High Court judgment of Mann J here; on the main decision and referral to Europe by the Court of Appeal here; on… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals sustained the New York State Comptroller’s decision that a New York - New Jersey Port Authority [Authority] compensation adjustment program [Program] that “artificially enhanced certain employees' final average salaries”* were not “pensionable compensation” under Retirement and Social Security Law §431(3).** The Authority’s Program served “to increase ... retirement benefits” for employees and… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals sustained the New York State Comptroller’s decision that a New York - New Jersey Port Authority [Authority] compensation adjustment program [Program] that “artificially enhanced certain employees' final average salaries”* were not “pensionable compensation” under Retirement and Social Security Law §431(3).** The Authority’s Program served “to increase ... retirement benefits” for employees and… [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The Court of Appeals sustained the New York State Comptroller’s decision that a New York - New Jersey Port Authority [Authority] compensation adjustment program [Program] that “artificially enhanced certain employees' final average salaries”* were not “pensionable compensation” under Retirement and Social Security Law §431(3).** The Authority’s Program served “to increase ... retirement benefits” for employees and… [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm
That's because, as I mentioned, the case was already past Judge Kuehnen's regional appeals court. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:44 am
Some of these questions have clear(er) answers in other states. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:36 am
We also have the Supreme Court’s decision in Crookes v. [read post]
Pre-trial order settling “personal property” precludes equitable distribution of retirement accounts
21 Apr 2013, 8:39 am
Such ambiguity was an issue in the April 17, 2013 Court of Appeals opinion in Schultze v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:25 pm
" The Supreme Court agreed and ended the litigation.On appeal, the Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. [read post]
