Search for: "State v. Dominic"
Results 2461 - 2480
of 4,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 11:06 am
EPA and Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 7:31 am
The “public concern” test from employment cases is a poor fit for the reasons stated by the dissent. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
So, provided that absolute and relative grounds serve different purposes -– the protection of (i) a general interest and of (ii) the individual trade mark holder -- the AG stated that the relevant public has only one overall impression of the mark -- but that, for absolute grounds of refusal of registration the focus is on possible connections between the mark or its components and the goods and services covered while, for relative grounds, the focus is on the process of… [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” He stated that the value of intelligence can only be judged in hindsight. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:57 am
It is dominant and explicit in Section 8. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
As in Hammon v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
That does not mean that the rights they protect are unlimited or that the proper exercise of judicial review would limit government to the powers enjoyed by a Lockean minimal state. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am
Wednesday’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
The much-awaited Supreme Court oral argument in King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am
” And he quickly brought up a prior precedent (South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:42 am
But much of the early questioning was dominated by a real-life hypothetical from Justice Kagan, suggesting that petitioner’s reading does not accord with everyday usage. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:39 am
Accordingly, a broadcast will be considered election propaganda if its dominant effect is influence on voters. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Indeed, Panama City’s location is within “narrow-body” range, the typical distance that the single-aisle airplanes which dominate the Latin American market can travel, of nearly all major cities within the Americas. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 7:39 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 7:39 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 9:04 pm
The oral arguments in King v. [read post]
